KS · rules
Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 165
Reasons for Decision
(a) Court Must State Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. In a contested matter submitted to the court without a jury—and when the court grants a motion for summary judgment—the court must state its findings of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with K.S.A. 60‑252.
(b) Presumption That Evidence Was Considered. If evidence was admitted over proper objection in a matter submitted to the court without a jury, and in the reasons for the decision the court does not state that the evidence—specifying the evidence with particularity—was not considered, then it will be presumed in a subsequent proceeding that the court did consider the evidence in reaching its decision.
History
[History: Am. effective September 8, 2006; Restyled rule and amended effective July 1, 2012.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.kscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
e13306b969d002eb6eaf636d20c4baaf89e87605489a4e207fd8028287bea86d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.