Bindinglaw

KS · rules

Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 163

Ineffective Stipulation

activein force · 2012-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

A court is not required to give effect to a stipulation between counsel or an oral admission of counsel which is not:

(a) in writing and signed by the counsel to be charged with the stipulation or admission; or

(b) made a part of the record.

History

[History: Rule restyled effective July 1, 2012.]

Provenance

Source
www.kscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
1fdb120ad0c0b0d2cf3c9b645544bba656e808e9ffe68d1975ff96c64c76d337
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 163 — Ineffective Stipulation · binding.law