Ind. Trial Rule 42

Effective January 1, 2008

(A) Consolidation.

When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it

may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order

all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as

may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.

(B) Separate trials.

The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be

conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim,

counterclaim, or third-party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues, always preserving inviolate the right of

trial by jury.

(C) Submission to Jury in Stages.

The Court upon its own motion or the motion of any party for good cause shown may allow

the case to be tried and submitted to the jury in stages or segments including, but not limited

to, bifurcation of claims or issues of compensatory and punitive damages.

(D) Actions Pending in Different Courts.

When civil actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending in different courts,

a party to any of the actions may, by motion, request consolidation of those actions for the

purpose of discovery and any pre-trial proceedings. Such motion may only be filed in the

court having jurisdiction of the action with the earliest filing date and the court shall enter an

order of consolidation for the purpose of discovery and any pre-trial proceedings unless

good cause to the contrary is shown and found by the court to exist. In the event two or more

actions have the same earliest filing date, the motion may be filed only in the court having the

lowest court identifier number under Administrative Rule 8(B)(1), which court shall be

considered as having the action with the earliest filing date. Upon completion of discovery

and any pre-trial proceedings, each case which has been subject to the order of consolidation

shall be ordered returned to the court in which it was pending at the time the order of consolidation was made unless, after notice to all parties and a hearing, the court finds that the

action involves unusual or complicated issues of fact or law or involves a substantial question

of law of great public importance. In the event the court makes such a finding, it may enter an

order of consolidation for the purpose of trial. Except for cause pursuant to IC 34-35-1-1, the

right to a change of venue in any action consolidated under this rule shall be suspended during the period of consolidation. Such right shall be reinstated on entry of an order remanding

the action to the court in which it was pending at the time of consolidation and the time prescribed for the filing of a motion for change of venue shall be deemed tolled during the

period of suspension. Nothing in this Rule shall restrict the equitable discretion of the court

having the earliest filed action to dismiss or stay that action. If such an order is entered, that

court shall no longer be considered the court in which is pending the action with the earliest

filing date for purposes of this Rule. This Subsection (D) shall not apply to actions pending in

courts of limited jurisdiction and no such action may be consolidated with another under the

provisions of this Subsection (D).