IN · rules
Ind. Trial Rule 23.1
Derivative actions by shareholders
Effective January 1, 1970
In a derivative action brought by one or more shareholders or members or holders of an
interest in such shares or membership, legal or equitable, to enforce a right of a corporation
or of an unincorporated association, the corporation or association having failed to enforce a
right which may properly be asserted by it, the complaint shall be verified and shall allege
that the plaintiff was a shareholder or member or holder of an interest, legal or equitable, in
such shares or membership at the time of the transaction or any part thereof of which he
complains or that his share or membership thereafter devolved on him by operation of law,
and the complaint shall also allege with particularity the efforts, if any, made by the plaintiff,
to obtain the action he desires from the directors or comparable authority and the reasons
for his failure to obtain the action or for not making the effort. The derivative action may not
be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and adequately represent the
interests of the shareholders or members similarly situated in enforcing the right of the corporation or association. The action shall not be dismissed or compromised without the
approval of the court, and notice of the proposed dismissal or compromise shall be given to
shareholders or members in such manner as the court directs.
Provenance
- Source
- rules.incourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-01-2026-08-01
- Content hash
1e7651bf65d80fff9c5afa17832add6f80c3c015209dfe12f62e3e6926162e2e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.