Bindinglaw

IN · rules

Ind. Prof. Cond. Rule 7.1

Communications Concerning a Lawyer’s

activein force · 2024-10-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Services

Effective January 1, 2011

A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as

a whole not materially misleading.

Commentary

[1] This Rule governs all communications about a lawyer's services, including advertising

permitted by Rule 7.2. Whatever means are used to make known a lawyer's services,

statements about them must be truthful.

[2] Truthful statements that are misleading are also prohibited by this Rule. In the

absence of special circumstances that serve to protect the probable targets of a communication from being misled or deceived, a communication will violate Rule 7.1 if it:

(1) is intended or is likely to result in a legal action or a legal position being asserted

merely to harass or maliciously injure another;

(2) contains statistical data or other information based on past performance or an

express or implied prediction of future success;

(3) contains a claim about a lawyer, made by a third party, that the lawyer could not

personally make consistent with the requirements of this rule;

(4) appeals primarily to a lay person’s fear, greed, or desire for revenge;

(5) compares the services provided by the lawyer or a law firm with other lawyers’ services, unless the comparison can be factually substantiated;

(6) contains any reference to results obtained that may reasonably create an expectation of similar results in future matters;

(7) contains a dramatization or re-creation of events unless the advertising clearly and

conspicuously discloses that a dramatization or re-creation is being presented;

(8) contains a representation, testimonial, or endorsement of a lawyer or other statement that, in light of all the circumstances, is intended or is likely to create an unjus-

tified expectation about a lawyer or law firm or a person’s legal rights;

(9) states or implies that a lawyer is a certified or recognized specialist other than as

permitted by Rule 7.4;

(10) is prohibited by Rule 7.3.

[3] See also Rule 8.4(e) for the prohibition against stating or implying an ability to influ-

ence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.

Provenance

Source
rules.incourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-in-22-2024-10-01
Content hash
76acf99174000ed8410b0d1dfbde9947c33d37f363488518f187d806c8bb1263
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.