IN · rules
Ind. Prof. Cond. Rule 6.2
Accepting Appointments
Effective January 1, 2005
A lawyer shall not seek to avoid appointment by a tribunal to represent a person except for
good cause, such as when:
(a) representing the client is likely to result in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or
other law;
(b) representing the client is likely to result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer; or
(c) the client or the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer's ability to represent the client.
Comment
[1] A lawyer ordinarily is not obliged to accept a client whose character or cause the lawyer regards as repugnant. The lawyer's freedom to select clients is, however, qualified. All
lawyers have a responsibility to assist in providing pro bono publico service. See Rule
6.1. An individual lawyer may fulfill this responsibility by accepting a fair share of unpopular matters or indigent or unpopular clients. A lawyer may also be subject to appointment
by a court to serve unpopular clients or persons unable to afford legal services.
Appointed Counsel
[2] For good cause a lawyer may seek to decline an appointment to represent a person
who cannot afford to retain counsel or whose cause is unpopular. Good cause exists if the
lawyer could not handle the matter competently, see Rule 1.1, or if undertaking the representation would result in an improper conflict of interest, for example, when the client or
the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer's ability to represent the client. A lawyer may also seek to decline
an appointment if acceptance would be unreasonably burdensome, for example, when it
would impose a financial sacrifice so great as to be unjust.
[3] An appointed lawyer has the same obligations to the client as retained counsel, including the obligations of loyalty and confidentiality, and is subject to the same limitations on
the client-lawyer relationship, such as the obligation to refrain from assisting the client in
violation of the Rules.
Provenance
- Source
- rules.incourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-22-2024-10-01
- Content hash
9caf1a6f31a7c83df68e19ee9ea2cb1892cdb5caa334f9d6dfc24674c82f2704
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.