IN · rules
Ind. Prof. Cond. Rule 6.1
Pro Bono Publico Service
Effective January 1, 2010
A lawyer should render public interest legal service. A lawyer may discharge this responsibility by providing professional services at no fee or a reduced fee to persons of limited
means or to public service or charitable groups or organizations, by service in activities for
improving the law, the legal system or the legal profession, and by financial support for organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means.
Comment
[1] The American Bar Association House of Delegates has formally acknowledged “the
basic responsibility of each lawyer engaged in the practice of law to provide public
interest legal services” without fee, or at a substantially reduced fee, in one or more of the
following areas: poverty law, civil rights law, public rights law, charitable organization representation and the administration of justice. The Indiana State Bar Association's House
of Delegates has declared that “all Indiana lawyers have an ethical and a social obligation
to provide uncompensated legal assistance to poor persons” and adopted an aspirational
goal of fifty hours a year, or an equivalent financial contribution, for each member of the
bar.
For purposes of this paragraph:
(a) Poverty law means legal representation of a client who does not have the financial
resources to compensate counsel.
(b) Civil rights (including civil liberties) law means legal representation involving a right
of an individual that society has a special interest in protecting.
(c) Public rights law means legal representation involving an important right belonging
to a significant segment of the public.
(d) Charitable organization representation means legal service to or representation of
charitable, religious, civic, governmental and educational institutions in matters in
furtherance of the organization’s purpose, where the payment of customary legal fees
would significantly deplete the organization’s economic resources or where it would be
inappropriate.
(e) Administration of justice means activity, whether under bar association auspices or
otherwise, which is designed to increase the availability of legal representation, or otherwise improve the administration of justice. This may include increasing the availability of legal resources to individuals or groups, improving the judicial system, or
reforming legal institutions that significantly affect the lives of disadvantaged individuals and groups.
[2] The rights and responsibilities of individuals and organizations in the United States are
increasingly defined in legal terms. As a consequence, legal assistance in coping with the
web of statutes, rules and regulations is imperative for persons of modest and limited
means, as well as for the relatively well-to-do.
[3] The basic responsibility for providing legal services for those unable to pay ultimately
rests upon the individual lawyer, and personal involvement in the problems of the disadvantaged can be one of the most rewarding experiences in the life of a lawyer. Every
lawyer, regardless of professional prominence or professional workload, should find time
to participate in or otherwise support the provision of legal services to the disadvantaged.
The provision of free legal services to those unable to pay reasonable fees continues to
be an obligation of each lawyer as well as the profession generally, but the efforts of individual lawyers are often not enough to meet the need. Thus, it has been necessary for the
profession and government to institute additional programs to provide legal services.
Accordingly, legal aid offices, lawyer referral services and other related programs have
been developed, and others will be developed by the profession and government. Every
lawyer should support all proper efforts to meet this need for legal services.
[4] Typically, to fulfill the aspirational goals in Comment 1, legal services should be performed without the expectation of compensation. If, during the course of representation, a
paying client is no longer able to afford a lawyer’s legal services, and the lawyer continues
to represent the client at no charge, any work performed with the knowledge and intent of
no compensation may be considered pro bono legal service.
The award of attorney’s fees in a case originally accepted as pro bono does not disqualify
such services from fulfilling the foregoing aspirational goals. However, lawyers who
receive attorney’s fees in pro bono cases are strongly encouraged to contribute an appropriate portion of such fees to organizations or projects that benefit persons of limited
means, or that promote access to justice for persons of limited means.
[5] Typically, the following would not fulfill the aspirational goals in Comment 1:
(a) Legal services written off as bad debts.
(b) Legal services performed for family members.
(c) Legal services performed for political organizations for election purposes.
(d) Activities that do not involve the provision of legal services, such as serving on the
board of a charitable organization.
Provenance
- Source
- rules.incourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-22-2024-10-01
- Content hash
1d92807362831b66a6b62c23032d8684550f991a2b8a49db38ec307ff2b82144
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.