IN · rules
Ind. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.1
Competence
Effective January 1, 2018
A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation
requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for
the representation.
Comment
Legal Knowledge and Skill
[1] In determining whether a lawyer employs the requisite knowledge and skill in a particular matter, relevant factors include the relative complexity and specialized nature of
the matter, the lawyer's general experience, the lawyer's training and experience in the
field in question, the preparation and study the lawyer is able to give the matter and
whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of established competence in the field in question. In many instances, the required proficiency is
that of a general practitioner. Expertise in a particular field of law may be required in some
circumstances.
[2] A lawyer need not necessarily have special training or prior experience to handle legal
problems of a type with which the lawyer is unfamiliar. A newly admitted lawyer can be as
competent as a practitioner with long experience. Some important legal skills, such as the
analysis of precedent, the evaluation of evidence and legal drafting, are required in all
legal problems. Perhaps the most fundamental legal skill consists of determining what
kind of legal problems a situation may involve, a skill that necessarily transcends any particular specialized knowledge. A lawyer can provide adequate representation in a wholly
novel field through necessary study. Competent representation can also be provided
through the association of a lawyer of established competence in the field in question.
[3] In an emergency a lawyer may give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required where referral to or consultation or association with another lawyer would be impractical. Even in an emergency, however,
assistance should be limited to that reasonably necessary in the circumstances, for ill-considered action under emergency conditions can jeopardize the client's interest.
[4] A lawyer may accept representation where the requisite level of competence can be
achieved by reasonable preparation. This applies as well to a lawyer who is appointed as
counsel for an unrepresented person. See also Rule 6.2.
Thoroughness and Preparation
[5] Competent handling of a particular matter includes inquiry into and analysis of the factual and legal elements of the problem, and use of methods and procedures meeting the
standards of competent practitioners. It also includes adequate preparation. The required
attention and preparation are determined in part by what is at stake; major litigation and
complex transactions ordinarily require more extensive treatment than matters of lesser
complexity and consequence. An agreement between the lawyer and the client regarding
the scope of the representation may limit the matters for which the lawyer is responsible.
See Rule 1.2(c).
Maintaining Competence
[6] To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of
changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with the
technology relevant to the lawyer’s practice, engage in continuing study and education
and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject.
Provenance
- Source
- rules.incourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-22-2024-10-01
- Content hash
ed45a34550d254c1f90b2906238de37082ad82ffed920db30fa5d8c73f65abfd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.