Bindinglaw

IN · rules

Ind. Sup. Ct. Order Approving Local Rules: order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-43

order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-43

activein force · 2026-10-02 – presentcompiled-edition

In the

Indiana Supreme Court

In the Matter of the Approval of Local

Rules for DeKalb County

Supreme Court Case No.

25S-MS-43

Order Approving Amended Local Rule

The Judges of the DeKalb Circuit and Superior Courts request the approval of an

amended local rule for caseload allocation and criminal case assignment in accordance with

Administrative Rule 1(E). Attached to this Order is the proposed amended local rule.

Upon examination of the proposed rule amendments requested by the DeKalb Circuit and

Superior Courts, this Court finds that the proposed amendments to LR17-AR1-1 comply with

the requirements of Administrative Rule 1(E), and, accordingly, should be approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by this Court that amended Local Rule, LR17-AR1-1,

for the DeKalb Circuit and Superior Courts, set forth as an attachment to this Order, is effective

on the date of this Order.

Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, on ______________.

Loretta H. Rush

Chief Justice of Indiana

3/3/2025

LR17-AR1-1 Caseload Allocation Plan for DeKalb County Courts

(A) Cases to be filed exclusively in the DeKalb Circuit Court:

JC*, JD, JS, JP, JM, JT, JQ, RS, and Nonsupport of a child cases filed under

I.C.35-46-1-5 shall be filed exclusively in DeKalb Circuit Court.

*JC - When the Judge of DeKalb Circuit Court has a conflict, the case shall be filed in

DeKalb Superior Court II.

(B) Cases to be filed exclusively in the DeKalb Superior Court I:

FD, F6 (except Nonsupport of child cases), CM, MC**, OV-based on moving traffic

violations, and specialized driving privileges filed as MI cases.

** In the event DeKalb Superior Court I is unable to hear a search warrant when

requested, the warrant may be requested of and issued by any of the Judges or Courts.

** Probation transfer cases shall be filed in the same manner as criminal cases, i.e.,

Misdemeanor and FD and F6 probation cases shall be filed in Superior Court I. MR, FA,

FB, FC, F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 probation cases shall be filed on a rotating basis between

Superior I and Superior II.

(C) Cases to be filed exclusively in the DeKalb Superior Court II:

SC, EM, ES, TR, IF, PL, MF, CT, EV, CC

(D) Cases to be filed on a rotating basis between DeKalb Circuit Court and DeKalb Superior

Court II:

DN, DC, MH, AD, EU, GU, PO, RF, MI-except specialized driving privilege cases, TP,

TS

(E) Cases to be filed on a rotating basis between DeKalb Superior Court I and DeKalb

Superior Court II:

MR, FA, FB & FC, OE, OV-other than moving traffic violations, CB***, F1, F2, F3, F4,

F5

(F) XP cases shall be filed in the Court with the underlying criminal case. Where an XP

applies to cases in multiple courts, it shall be filed in the Court with the highest level

offense. Where an XP applies to cases in multiple courts with the same highest level, the

case shall be filed in the Court with the most recent highest level case.

*** CB cases involving the appointment of Special, Pro Tem, and Senior Judges shall be

filed in the Court making the appointment.

Resolutions Spread of Record may be filed in any Court.

When additional criminal charges are filed against a Defendant with a pending criminal case, the

new charges shall be filed in the same Court as the pending case.

In the event the Judge of DeKalb Superior Court I or II enters a recusal in a criminal case due to

a conflict, the case shall be filed in or transferred to DeKalb Circuit Court.

For all other conflicts, and except as otherwise provided by this Plan, the Judge of the Court

where the case was originally filed shall transfer the case to either of the other Courts in DeKalb

County.

PC - The case is to be filed in the court in which the underlying conviction was entered. After

hour search warrants may be requested of and authorized by any of the judges.

This caseload allocation plan shall be effective until modified. The DeKalb County Judges shall

meet as necessary to review the caseload allocation. Nothing in these rules or case allocation

plan shall restrict or impair a Court’s ability to transfer cases pursuant to IC 33-29-1-9.

Provenance

Source
www.in.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-in-26-65-order-local-rules-2025-25s-ms-43-2026-10-02
Content hash
149253c1981699abbcfd322a65751e029fb1b5219724931bfaabadaa270e5fc5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.