IN · rules
Ind. Sup. Ct. Order Approving Local Rules: order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-366
order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-366
In the
Indiana Supreme Court
In the Matter of the Approval of Local
Rules for Boone County
Supreme Court Case No.
25S-MS-366
Order Approving Amended Local Rules
The Judges of the Boone Circuit and Superior Courts request the approval of amended
local rules for caseload allocation in accordance with Administrative Rule 1(E) and for special
judge assignments in accordance with Trial Rule 79 and Administrative Rule 21. Attached to
this Order are the proposed amended local rules.
Upon examination of the proposed rule amendments requested by the Boone Circuit and
Superior Courts, this Court finds that the amendments to LR06-CR00-BLR-3 and LR06-AR01-
BLR-12 comply with Administrative Rule 1(E) and Administrative Rule 21, and the
amendments to LR06-TR79-BLR-10 comply with Trial Rule 79, and, accordingly, should be
approved.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by this Court that amended Local Rules, LR06-CR00-
BLR-3, LR06-AR01-BLR-12, and LR06-TR79-BLR-10, for the Boone Circuit and Superior
Courts, set forth as attachments to this Order, are approved effective January 1, 2026.
Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, on _____________.
Loretta H. Rush
Chief Justice of Indiana
12/23/2025
LR06-CR00-BLR-3
NON-DISCRETIONARY FILING OF CRIMINAL CASES
NON-DISCRETIONARY FILING OF CRIMINAL CASES
Effective January 1, 2021, (or as soon thereafter as the Indiana Supreme Court may approve if later), all
criminal cases, when filed, shall be assigned by the Clerk to the Circuit, Superior I, or Superior II Courts
of the Judicial Circuit as follows:
Misdemeanors (cases in which only misdemeanors are charged)
A. Cases in which the only misdemeanor charged is Operator Never Licensed, I.C. 9-24-18-
1, shall be assigned to Circuit Court.
B. Cases in which the only misdemeanor charged is Driving While Suspended, I.C. 9-24-19-
2 or 9-24-19-3, shall be assigned to Circuit Court.
C. Cases in which the only misdemeanors charged are Driving While Suspended, I.C. 9-24-
19-(2-3) and Operator Never Licensed, I.C. 9-24-18-1, shall be assigned to Circuit Court.
D. All other I.C. 9 et. seq. (Title IX traffic) misdemeanor cases (including any other Driving
While Suspended charge besides I.C. 9-24-19-2 or 9-24-19-3 and any case where a Driving While
Suspended charge is accompanied with other misdemeanor charges (except for Operating Never
Licensed) shall be assigned to Superior Court II.
E. All cases charging misdemeanors under I.C. 35-48-4, 35-42-2-1, 35-43-5, and Title VII
crimes, alone or in conjunction with other misdemeanor offenses, shall be assigned to Superior Court II.
F. All other misdemeanor cases, not covered by A-D, shall be assigned to Circuit Court.
G. All cases where a specialized driving permit is sought under I.C. 9-30-16-4, whether
administrative suspension or otherwise, shall be assigned to Superior Court II.
H. All Warrantless Seizure of a Firearm(s) by a Law Enforcement Officer cases, also known
as “Red Flag” or “Jake Laird law” cases (“RF”) under I.C. 35-47-14, shall be assigned to Superior Court
I.
Felonies:
I. All cases in which one or more felony counts are charged under I.C. 35-36-1-3, 35-36-1-
4, or 35-36-1-5 (incest, neglect of a dependent, and criminal nonsupport of a child) shall be assigned to
Circuit Court.
J. All cases in which the only felony count charged is Driving While Suspended under I.C.
9-24-2-4 shall be assigned to Superior Court I.
K. All felony cases, not covered by paragraph F or G, in which the only felony charged is a
charge under I.C. 9 et. seq. (a Title IX Traffic offense) shall be assigned to Superior Court II.
L. All felony and misdemeanor operating while intoxicated cases shall be assigned to
Superior Court II, no matter what other felony charges may be filed therewith.
M. All level 6 felony cases not assigned pursuant to paragraphs H through K shall be
assigned 50% to Circuit Court and 50% to Superior Court II by random draw. All level 5 and higher
felony cases not assigned pursuant to paragraphs H through K shall be assigned 30% to Circuit Court,
50% to Superior Court I, and 20% to Superior Court II by random draw.
N. If a case charges both a non-traffic code felony and a misdemeanor, other than an alcohol
related misdemeanor, the case shall be considered a felony and assigned pursuant to paragraph J above.
O. The rotation of cases under Paragraph L shall be accomplished by drawing numbered
balls in proportion to the division of the cases. The balls (those selected and those yet to be selected) shall
be securely maintained by the Clerk of the Court. Each time a felony case is assigned, pursuant to
paragraph L, the Clerk shall draw a ball and assign the case to the Court designated on that ball. The ball
drawn shall be held by the Clerk with the other balls that have been drawn until all balls have been drawn.
At that point, all balls shall be returned to the receptacle from which they are drawn, and the process shall
begin anew. The Clerk shall maintain a log of the balls drawn and the case assignments made. A
“selection sheet” shall be placed in each file assigned, pursuant to paragraph L, noting the person who
made the draw and the Court to which the case was assigned.
P. If, after assignment, a case is dismissed and later re-filed, it shall be assigned to the Court
of original assignment. The purpose of this rule is to comply with Indiana Administrative Rule 21, so as
to provide a procedure for non-discretionary assignment of criminal cases.
Q. In cases assigned, pursuant to paragraph L above, where a charge or charges are filed
against one or more than one defendant and such charge or charges arise out of the same factual
allegations or same criminal episode, such cases shall be assigned, upon the request of the prosecutor, to
the same Court in which the first such case was assigned, pursuant to paragraph J. In such an event, the
subsequent case or cases shall be assigned to the same court as the first one, and another ball shall be
removed from the draw for the court to which the subsequent case was assigned.
R. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, the Judges of Boone County may agree to transfer
any criminal case between or among themselves upon good cause shown by the prosecutor or counsel for
the Defendant, or upon their own motion, when in the interests of judicial economy or the interests of
justice so require.
S. Excepting driving offenses under I.C. 9-30-5, upon a motion from the State of Indiana or
the Defendant, a court shall transfer a felony case to another court where an earlier filed felony of the
same level pends or where a higher-level felony pends, regardless of the order of filing. The nonmoving
party may file a written objection setting forth the basis of the same on or before the twentieth day from
the initial hearing or other date as the court may allow, and the court shall consider the objection and
sustain or overrule it as may be warranted. The court may set a hearing if necessary on any objection to a
motion to transfer.
T. Pursuant to Administrative Rules 1(E)(6) and 21, the Circuit and Superior Courts of
Boone County, in conjunction with the other Judges of Administrative District 12, i.e., Hamilton County,
Clinton County, and Tipton County, have adopted the following rule to establish procedures for the
selection of special judges in criminal cases.
1. Upon the granting of a change of judge or the disqualification or recusal of a judge, a
successor judge shall be assigned in the same manner as the initial judge. Where this process does
not result in the selection of a successor judge, selection shall be made from an alternative
assignment list of full-time judicial officers from counties within the administrative district of the
court as set forth above. Except for those serving pursuant to Criminal Rule 2.4(E)(6), judges
previously assigned to the case are ineligible for reassignment. A person appointed to serve as a
special judge under this subsection must accept jurisdiction in the case unless the appointed
special judge is disqualified pursuant to the Code of Judicial Conduct, ineligible for service under
this Rule, or excused from service by the Indiana Supreme Court.
2. The Administrator of Courts for Hamilton County shall maintain a list of the judges
eligible for selection under T.1 and shall be contacted by the selecting court each time a judge
must be selected from the list. The Administrator of Courts shall provide the name of the next
judge on the list upon a request from the selecting court and then strike the name of the judge
selected from that list. The judge selected in this manner shall not be eligible to be selected again
from the same list until all the other judges have been selected from that list, except as required to
avoid certification to the Indiana Supreme Court.
3. A trial court may request the Indiana Supreme Court to appoint a special judge in the
following circumstances:
(a) No judge under the local rule is available for appointment: or
(b) The particular circumstance warrants the selection of a special judge by the Indiana
Supreme Court.
4. A judge assigned under the provision of this rule shall accept jurisdiction unless
disqualified under the Code of Judicial Conduct or excused from service by the Indiana Supreme
Court. The reassignment of a case or assignment of a special judge shall be entered in the
Chronological Case Summary of the case. An oath or special order accepting jurisdiction is not
required.
5. In the event the case has been reassigned, or a special judge assumes jurisdiction and
thereafter ceases to act for any reason, further reassignment or the selection of a successor special
judge shall be in the same manner as set forth in subsection T.1 above.
U. This rule shall not, under any circumstances, limit or otherwise alter the option of the
full-time sitting Judge to request the Indiana Supreme Court appoint a Special Judge in accordance with
Administrative Rule 21.
LR06-TR79-BLR-10
COORDINATED LOCAL RULE ON
SELECTION OF SPECIAL JUDGE IN CIVIL CASES
209.10 Pursuant to Trial Rule 79(H) of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, the Circuit and Superior
Courts of Boone County, in conjunction with the other Courts of Administrative District 12 (Clinton
County, Hamilton County, and Tipton County), have adopted the following rule to establish procedures
for the selection of special judges in civil cases:
209.20 Within seven (7) days of the notation in the Chronological Case Summary of an order granting a
change of judge or an order of disqualification, the parties pursuant to Trial Rule 79(D) may agree to any
judge eligible under Trial Rule 79 (J).
209.30 If a special judge is required to be selected under Trial Rule 79(H) then the special judge shall be
selected as follows:
209.30.10 If the case was originally filed in a court of record in Hamilton County, then the judge will
be selected randomly from among the full-time judicial officers of Hamilton County subject to all existing
local rules regarding case allocation and transfer.
209.30.20 If the case was originally filed in a court of record in Boone, Clinton or Tipton County, then
the judge will be selected on a rotating basis from among the full-time judges of those counties subject to all
local rules in each individual county regarding case allocation and transfer.
209.30.30 If for any reason a judge cannot be selected by the above methods then the special judge
shall be selected on a rotating basis from among all the full-time judges of the District not already disqualified.
209.40 A special judge selected under 209.30 must accept jurisdiction unless disqualified pursuant to The
Code of Judicial Conduct or excused from service by the Indiana Supreme Court. The Administrator of
Courts for Hamilton County shall maintain a list of the judges eligible for selection under 209.30.20 and a
list of the judges eligible for selection under 209.30.30 and shall be contacted by the selecting court each
time a judge must be selected from one of those lists. The Administrator of Courts shall provide the name of
the next judge on the appropriate list upon a request from the selecting court and then strike the name of the
judge selected from that list. The judge selected in this manner shall not be eligible to be selected again from
the same list until all other judges have been selected from that list except as required to avoid certification to
the Supreme Court.
209.50 In the event that no judicial officer within Administrative District 12 is eligible to serve as special
judge or the particular circumstance of the case warrants selection of a special judge by the Indiana
Supreme Court, the judge of the Court in which the case is pending shall certify the matter to the Indiana
Supreme Court for appointment of a special judge.
LR06-AR01-BLR-12
BOONE COUNTY’S CASE LOAD PLAN
We, the undersigned Judges of Boone County, in compliance with Indiana Administrative Rule
1(E), hereby adopt the “Boone County’s Case Load Plan.”
WHEREAS, Indiana Administrative Rule 1(E) requires the Judges of Boone County to
implement a caseload allocation plan for the county that ensures an even distribution of judicial workload
among the courts of record in the county; and
WHEREAS, the Courts of Boone County, pursuant to Legislative direction and the evolution of
time, have acquired certain subject matter expertise that the Judges of Boone County believe should not
be altered, but instead should be preserved and enhanced upon, i.e., Circuit Court has exclusive
jurisdiction over all juvenile matters, including, but not limited to, Status Offenses, Delinquent Offenses,
CHINS proceedings, Family Recovery Court proceedings and Paternity matters; all other case types listed
in Administrative Rule 8 not specifically designated shall be assigned to Circuit Court.
Superior I has exclusive jurisdiction over all Estates, Guardianships, Probate matters, and
Adoptions; and Red Flag (“RF”) cases: warrantless seizure of a firearm from an individual believed to be
dangerous (for affidavits filed under I.C. 35-47-14-3 Indiana’s “red flag” law).
Superior II has exclusive jurisdiction over all Small Claims (including EV-- Petition for Eviction)
and certain Alcohol and Drug Offenses;
WHEREAS, the Judges of Boone County have met and discussed Indiana Administrative Rule
1(E) and have established the following plan for allocation of judicial resources within Boone County,
which maintains the integrity of the courts in Boone County:
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the Judges of Boone County that for calendar year 2009
and beyond, within 60 days of the Supreme Court’s issuance of the previous year’s Weighted Caseload
Report, as reported by the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration (IOJA), the report will be reviewed
by the Judges to determine whether Boone County’s caseload complies with Indiana Administrative Rule
1(E).
To the extent that the difference in utilization of any two (2) Courts of Record exceeds 0.40
percentage points, then the Judges of Boone County agree to alter or modify the distribution of cases in
the County to bring each Court within the range of 0.40 percentage points by amending our local rules as
to the non-discretionary filing of certain cases. If all the courts of record are within 0.40 percentage
points, then no action will be taken.
The Judges of Boone County have determined that this method can be implemented with very
little administrative effort and that it will have a minimal effect on the Prosecuting Attorney’s office and a
negligible effect on the Local Bar Association. The statistics for the previous year’s criminal filings are
readily available, and the necessary adjustments can be made expediently and modifications made to non-discretionary filing local rules can be easily distributed to the Clerk’s Office and the Prosecutor’s Office.
Consistent with the schedule to be set and monitored by the IOJA, the Boone County Judges will
review weighted caseload statistics and submit a new caseload allocation plan or resubmit an existing
plan every two (2) years. In addition, amended local rules on non-discretionary filings will be
implemented by Boone County Judges when applicable. Moreover, the Judges of Boone County have
agreed to review this Rule every two years to determine whether other adjustments should be made in the
distribution of cases.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-26-24-order-local-rules-2025-25s-ms-366-2026-01-01
- Content hash
3b3eb547ab369913b1d03e6f76c051cd1500759f822d591bc3a40044c36af032
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.