Bindinglaw

IN · rules

Ind. Sup. Ct. Order Approving Local Rules: order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-351

order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-351

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

In the

Indiana Supreme Court

In the Matter of the Approval of Local

Rules for Scott County

Supreme Court Case No.

25S-MS-351

Order Approving Amended Local Rules

The Judges of the Scott Circuit and Superior Courts request the approval of amended local

rules for caseload allocation in accordance with Administrative Rule 1(E) and for special judge

assignments in accordance with Administrative Rule 21 and Trial Rule 79. Attached to this

Order are the proposed amended local rules.

Upon examination of the proposed rule amendments requested by the Scott Circuit and

Superior Courts, this Court finds that the proposed amendments to LR72-AR01-1 and LR72-

AR01-4 comply with the requirements of Administrative Rule 1(E) and Administrative Rule 21,

and the amendments to LR72-TR79-12 comply with Trial Rule 79, and, accordingly, should be

approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by this Court that amended Local Rules, LR72-AR01-

1, LR72-AR01-4, and LR72-TR79-12, for the Scott Circuit and Superior Courts, set forth as

attachments to this Order, are approved effective January 1, 2026.

Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, on ___________ .

Loretta H. Rush

Chief Justice of Indiana

12/16/2025

LOCAL RULE NO. LR72-AR01-1

ASSIGNMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES

AND SPECIAL JUDGE ASSIGNMENT

The Courts of Scott County, Indiana, adopt the following rules for the assignment of

criminal cases and the selection of special judges in criminal cases:

A. All criminal cases (MR, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, CM) shall be filed in Circuit

Court regardless of the level of felony or misdemeanor except as set forth in Paragraph C of this

rule.

B. All other criminal cases or proceedings, including infractions (IF), miscellaneous

criminal (MC), expungements (XP), post-conviction relief (PC), and Red Flag (RF) (criminal),

shall be filed in Circuit Court.

C. When there is a recusal by the sitting Judge, or when a motion for change of

Judge has been granted, then, pursuant to Rule 21 of the Indiana Administrative Rules, the case

shall be assigned to another full-time Scott County judicial officer on a rotating basis.

D. If a full-time Scott County judicial officer is unavailable to serve as special

judge, the case may be assigned to a senior judge who has agreed to serve as a special judge

before proceeding to section E.

E. If the case cannot be assigned to a Scott County judicial officer or a senior judge,

the Administrative District’s Assignment Judge shall assign a judge randomly from the list of

full-time judges of the following Courts, consisting of Courts in contiguous counties and Courts

within the Administrative District:

1. Jennings Circuit Court

2. Jefferson Circuit Court

3. Jefferson Superior Court

4. Jefferson Circuit and Superior Courts Magistrate

5. Washington Circuit Court

6. Washington Superior Court

7. Jackson Superior Court 1

8. Jennings Superior Court

9. Jackson Superior Court 2

10. Jackson Circuit Court

11. Clark Circuit Court 1

12. Clark Circuit Court 2

13. Clark Circuit Court 3

14. Clark Circuit Court 4

15. Clark Circuit Court 5

16. Clark Circuit Court 6

17. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #1

18. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #2

19. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #3

20. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #4

21. Floyd Circuit Court

22. Floyd Superior Court 1

23. Floyd Superior Court 2

24. Floyd Superior Court 3

25. Floyd Circuit and Superior Court Magistrate

26. Senior Judges who agree to serve as Special Judge

LOCAL RULE NO. LR72-AR01-4

ALLOCATION OF JUDICIAL RESOURCES

A. Not later than May 15 of each year, all regular Judges of the Scott Circuit and

Superior Court shall meet, in person, telephonically, or other means, and shall evaluate each

Court’s caseload data, as reported to the Office of Judicial Administration.

B. The caseload evaluation shall factor in any special circumstances, such as death

penalty cases and service on judicial or county boards, committees, district judicial leadership

positions, and local administration.

C. Service as transfer judge or special judge. Time spent doing special or transfer

judge service by each Judge outside his or her court and special judge service or transfer judge

service in each Court shall also be included.

D. Based upon the foregoing caseload evaluation for each court within the county,

the designated Judge shall develop and maintain a roster reflecting the weighted caseloads of

each court and the judicial officer need or surplus in each court. Any plan for adjustment of

caseload should then compare that need or surplus to the utilization range established in

Administrative Rule 1(E).

E. Should the above said evaluation indicate that the weighted caseloads of any Court

are not within the county range, the Judges shall adopt a plan whereby (a) case type filings are

shifted, or (b) causes are transferred between courts pursuant to I.C. 33-29-1-9, (c) Judges sit as

Judge of the other court pursuant to I.C. 33-29-1-10, as to bring all courts within the range.

F. Civil Cases: All Civil Plenary, Mortgage Foreclosure, Civil Collection, Civil Tort,

Eviction, and Miscellaneous cases (PL, MF, CC, CT, EV, and MI) shall be filed in Superior

Court, except as provided by statute or as otherwise indicated below. Other civil proceedings as

identified by Rule 8 of the Indiana Administrative Rules shall be filed as follows:

G. Any action involving a land contract as defined in I.C. 24-4.4-1-301(36) shall be

filed as a civil action and not as a small claims case.

H. Proceedings for an order of protection (PO) under I.C. 34-26-2-1 et. seq. shall be

filed in Scott Superior Court, with the exception that the protective order proceeding shall be

filed in Scott Circuit Court if there is a pending dissolution (DR) or paternity (JP) case filed there or if

the Petitioner or Respondent is a juvenile. The Clerk of Courts shall inquire of a petitioner if such

dissolution or paternity case is pending in this county or any other county before assigning the case to a

court. Prior to referring a petitioner in a protective order proceeding to the appropriate court, the Clerk

of Courts shall review the petition as to the completion of that petition to ensure that the petition

contains all appropriate and available information.

The following juvenile and domestic relations cases shall be assigned by the Clerk to a

special judge:

1. Paternity (JP) and Reciprocal (RS) cases filed before January 1, 2017.

2. Domestic Relations (DR) cases filed in Scott Circuit Court before January 1,

2017, for which there was representation by the Title IV-D Office of the Scott

County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office between January 1, 2005, and December 31,

2016.

3. Domestic Relations cases (DR, DN, or DC) filed in Scott Superior Court for

which there is or was representation by the Title IV-D Office of the Scott

County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office on or after January 1, 2017.

LR72-TR79-12

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGES

A. Selection of Assignment Judge. On or before October 1st of each year, the Judges

of the Circuit and Superior Courts of Scott County shall meet with the presiding judges of

Administrative District 23 for the purpose of selecting a judge designated as the assignment

judge who shall serve the Administrative District for a period of twelve (12) months.

B. Section H Appointments. In the event it becomes necessary to appoint a special

judge under Section H of Trial Rule 79 of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, the judge before

the case is pending shall send notice of the need of the appointment of a special judge to the

Administrative District’s assignment judge who shall then make such assignment within five (5)

days of receiving said notice.

C. When there is a recusal by the sitting Judge, or when a motion for change of

Judge has been granted, the case shall be assigned to another full-time Scott County judicial

officer on a rotating basis.

D. Method of Assignment. If the case cannot be assigned to a Scott County judicial

officer, the Administrative District’s assignment judge shall select a special judge from a roster

of the full-time judges in the Administrative District. The assignments shall be in a sequential

order beginning with the name of the judge following the last judge so assigned. If, however, a

judge is otherwise disqualified to hear a particular case, that judge shall be deemed to be the next

in sequence until assigned a case. The assignment judge shall maintain a record of all

assignments and shall issue a summary report of the assignments on a quarterly basis.

E. Roster of Full-Time Judges. The roster of available judges in Administrative

District 23 shall be maintained by Court designation in the following sequential order.

1. Clark Circuit #1

2. Clark Circuit #2

3. Clark Circuit #3

4. Clark Circuit #4

5. Clark Circuit #5

6. Clark Circuit #6

7. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #1

8. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #2

9. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #3

10. Clark Circuit Courts Magistrate #4

11. Floyd Circuit

12. Floyd Superior #1

13. Floyd Superior #2

14. Floyd Superior #3

15. Floyd Circuit and Superior Courts Magistrate

16. Senior Judges who agree to serve as Special Judge

F. Appointment Order. Upon selecting a special judge, the assignment judge shall

prepare an Order of Appointment and forward said Order to the judge before whom the case is

pending and enter an Order of Appointment and forward a copy of the Order to the special judge

and the attorneys of record.

G. Acceptance of Jurisdiction. The Order of Appointment, when entered by the judge

before whom the case is pending, shall constitute acceptance of jurisdiction by the appointed

special judge unless the judge is otherwise disqualified, and no special appearance, oath, or

additional evidence of acceptance shall be required.

H. Form of Order. The Order of Appointment shall be in the following form:

IN THE COURT FOR COUNTY

STATE OF INDIANA

(Caption)

ORDER OF APPOINTMENT

Under the provisions of Trial Rule 79(H) of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedures, the Honorable

of the Court of County is hereby

appointed to serve as special judge in the above-captioned case.

SO ORDERED AND ASSIGNED THIS DAY OF, BY THE

ASSIGNMENT JUDGE FOR THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT.

Assignment Judge

I. Implementation of Rule. In the event a selected Judge does not accept an

appointment to serve as a special Judge under the provisions of section (D), (E) or (F) of Trial

Rule 79 of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, the judge before whom the case is pending shall

notify the assignment judge of the need for an appointment of a special judge under this local

rule.

J. Certification to the Supreme Court. If, under the provisions of this rule, no judge

is eligible to serve as a special judge in a case, the assignment judge shall notify the judge before

whom the case is pending, who shall then certify such fact to the Indiana Supreme Court for the

appointment of a special judge.

If the judge before whom the case is pending is of the opinion that the particular circumstances of

a case warrant selection of a special judge by the Indiana Supreme Court, said judge shall certify such

facts to the Indiana Supreme Court for the appointment of a special Judge. Under such circumstances,

this Rule shall not be implemented unless the Indiana Supreme Court declines to appoint a special judge.

Provenance

Source
www.in.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-in-26-25-order-local-rules-2025-25s-ms-351-2026-01-01
Content hash
7d2deb48d26d6df3712bc6813497bc833b76b054afce467367d62860831421b6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.