IN · rules
Ind. Sup. Ct. Order Approving Local Rules: order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-235
order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-235
In the
Indiana Supreme Court
In the Matter of the Approval of Local
Rules for Hancock County
Supreme Court Case No.
25S-MS-235
Order Approving Amended Local Rule
The Judges of the Hancock Circuit and Superior Courts request the approval of an
amended local rule for caseload allocation in accordance with Administrative Rule 1(E).
Attached to this Order is the proposed amended local rule.
Upon examination of the proposed rule amendments requested by the Hancock Circuit
and Superior Courts, this Court finds that the proposed amendments to LR30-AR00-2 comply
with the requirements of Administrative Rule 1(E), and, accordingly, should be approved.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by this Court that amended Local Rule, LR30-AR00-2,
for the Hancock Circuit and Superior Courts, set forth as an attachment to this Order, is
approved effective January 1, 2026.
Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, on ___________ .
Loretta H. Rush
Chief Justice of Indiana
9/5/2025
LR30-AR00-2 Caseload allocation plan
Plan Concepts
The Local Plan shall be premised upon a review and evaluation of:
1. Weighted Caseload Measures (WCLM) information for the courts;
2. Resources and needs of individual courts within the Circuit as well as available judicial
resources,
3. Measures which would facilitate as well as impede implementation of the Plan; and,
4. Mechanics for the implementation of the Plan.
Judicial Circuit Plan
Case types shall be docketed in the courts of the Circuit only as indicated:
a. Circuit Court and Superior Court No. 1
MR, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, MC, JD, JS, PL, CC, MF, CT, CE, DN, DC, RS, MH, AD, AH, EM,
ES, EU, EV, GU, GM, GV, TR, MI, PO, RF, RA, and XP.
b. Superior Court No. 2
All F6, CM, JC, JM, JT, MC, IF, OV, SC
All cases filed in the civil docket of the Hancock Circuit and Superior Court No. 1 shall
be filed on a random basis by the Clerk pursuant to a method approved by the courts, with the
exception that a manual assignment will occur if there is a related case in another court.
The Judges of the Circuit and Superior Courts retain authority to reassign all types of
cases between the courts whenever the workload of each court or convenience in the handling of
cases makes case reassignment judicially prudent.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-26-43-order-local-rules-2025-25s-ms-235-2026-01-01
- Content hash
d34ca7e9d479eb0f9f58a4cda9a703e054e4869a528ddd587c70e86f890fdebd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.