IN · rules
Ind. Sup. Ct. Order Approving Local Rules: order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-178
order-local-rules-2025-25S-MS-178
In the
Indiana Supreme Court
In the Matter of the Approval of Local
Rules for Ripley County
Supreme Court Case No.
25S-MS-178
Order Approving Amended Local Rules
The Judges of the Ripley Circuit and Superior Courts request the approval of amended
local rules for caseload allocation and case assignments in accordance with Administrative
Rule 1(E), and for criminal special judge assignments in accordance with Administrative Rule
21. Attached to this Order are the proposed amended local rules.
Upon examination of the proposed rule amendments requested by the Ripley Circuit and
Superior Courts, this Court finds that the proposed amendments to LR69-AR-01 comply with
the requirements of Administrative Rule 1(E), and the amendments to LR69-AR-08 comply
with Administrative Rule 21, and, accordingly, should be approved.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by this Court that amended Local Rules, LR69-AR-01
and LR69-AR-08, for the Ripley Circuit and Superior Courts, set forth as attachments to this
Order, are approved effective on the date of this Order.
Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, on ___________ .
Loretta H. Rush
Chief Justice of Indiana
7/14/2025
LR69-AR-01 CASE ASSIGNMENT AND LOCAL CASELOAD PLAN
Unless otherwise required by statute, the Clerk of Ripley Circuit Court and Superior Courts and the
Prosecuting Attorney of Ripley County, to the extent applicable, are directed to file the
following types of cases in the following manner:
A. All A, B, & C Felonies, all Level 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 felonies, Murder and related Red Flag,
Post Conviction Relief Petitions and Expungements, Juvenile CHINS, Juvenile
Delinquent, Juvenile Status, Juvenile Paternity, Juvenile Miscellaneous, Juvenile
Termination of Parental Rights, Mental Health, Adoptions, Miscellaneous Estates,
Unsupervised Estates, Supervised Estates, Trusts, Guardianships, Grandparent
Visitation, Reciprocal Support, Domestic Relations, Domestic Relations with Children,
Domestic Relations without Children, Miscellaneous Civil, Civil Plenary, Civil Tort,
Commercial Court Eligible, and alternating Miscellaneous Criminal and unrelated Red
Flag in the Ripley Circuit Court.
B. All Level 6 and "D" Felonies, Criminal Misdemeanors and related Red Flag, Post
Conviction Relief Petitions and Expungements, Small Claims, Mortgage Foreclosure, Civil
Collections, Miscellaneous, Protective Orders, Judicial Review of Administrative Agency
Decisions, and alternating Miscellaneous Criminal and unrelated Red Flag, in the Ripley
Superior Court. The Prosecuting Attorney may file infractions and ordinance violations
in the Ripley Superior Court.
C. In criminal cases, the most serious count filed shall determine the proper court.
D. In the event the Prosecuting Attorney dismisses a criminal case and re-files against the
same Defendant or files another case in another court involving the same subject matter
and Defendant, the case shall be re-filed in the same Court in which the case was originally
filed or immediately transferred to the Court in which the same subject matter is pending.
E. In the event that a Defendant is charged with a Habitual Offender Enhancement
wherein Circuit Court Judge Ryan J. King prosecuted said Defendant for an alleged
predicate offense(s) and has recused (“recused Defendant”) and the State has also
filed a Motion to Join one or more other Defendant’s case(s) together with the
recused Defendant, then Superior Court Judge Jeffrey L. Sharp (or Special Judge
from list) may preside over the Motion to Join Hearing(s) and objections thereto, and,
if joined, any severance requests and related issues.
If Judge Sharp grants a Motion to Join two (2) or more cases and said cases remain
joined and proceed to a joint trial, then Judge Sharp will continue to preside over the
joined cases up to and through the joint trial and sentencing, if convicted, of all jointly
tried co-defendants.
If a Motion for Joinder is denied or denied as to any Defendant’s case; or the cases are
later severed; or the cases do not otherwise proceed to a joint trial, then the Defendant(s)
cases not proceeding to a joint trial with the recused Defendant’s case shall, as a general
matter, be transferred to Judge King for further proceedings and/or final disposition.
However, if good cause exists, such as a Criminal Rule 4 issue and/or a jury having
already been summonsed, Judge Sharp may dispose of said cases as necessary.
This subsection is to be construed so as to fulfill the purpose of allowing Defendant cases
to be tried together so long as a Judge finds that doing so is appropriate, but also to
ensure criminal cases are assigned as they otherwise would be, absent a joint trial, and
pursuant to the case allocation plan.
LR69-AR-08 SPECIAL JUDGE REASSIGNMENT
In the event it becomes necessary to reassign a criminal case under AR 21, in the Ripley Circuit
or Superior Court, the Clerk shall first reassign the case to the other sitting Ripley County
Judge and if that Judge cannot serve, then the Clerk shall reassign the case on a rotating basis
from the following list of judges in consecutive order:
1. Judge of the Dearborn-Ohio Circuit Court;
2. Magistrate of the Dearborn-Ohio Circuit Court;
3. Judge of the Dearborn Superior Court 1;
4. Judge of the Dearborn Superior Court 2;
5. Judge of the Decatur Circuit Court;
6. Judge of the Decatur Superior Court;
7. Magistrate of the Decatur Circuit/Superior Court;
8. Judge of the Franklin Circuit Court 1;
9. Judge of the Franklin Circuit Court 2;
10. Judge of the Jefferson Circuit Court;
11. Judge of the Jefferson Superior Court;
12. Magistrate of the Jefferson Circuit/Superior Court;
13. Judge of the Jennings Circuit Court;
14. Judge of the Jennings Superior Court;
15. Magistrate of the Jennings Circuit/Superior Court;
16. Judge of the Switzerland Circuit Court
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-26-60-order-local-rules-2025-25s-ms-178-2026-10-02
- Content hash
c58ef0934356a532c1c55f10bc1b68ff13b41baa94dce5ed525b3fb062148fc7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.