IN · rules
Ind. Marion Cnty. Small Cl. Local Rule LR49-SC11-404
Agreed Judgments and Post-judgment
PAYMENT PLANS
Agreed Judgments and payment plans shall be reviewed for approval by the Court. In determining
whether to approve the proposed judgment or payment plan, the Court shall consider in addition to
the requirements of SCR 11 whether the judgment requires payment from income or assets which
would be exempt from execution and if so whether the Defendant was informed of such exemption
rights before signing the agreement. A debtor’s signature on a Court-prescribed Notice of
Exemption Rights Form shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that the debtor was informed of
his/her exemption rights. The absence of the same shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption the
debtor was not informed of his/her exemption rights.
Comment: This provision is consistent with Branham v. Varble, which indicates that it is
appropriate for Judges in small claims proceedings to advise pro se litigants of their exemption
rights, at least as it pertains to the general wage and SSI exemptions. Branham v. Varble, 952
N.E.2d 744, 748 (Ind. 2011).
Citation(s):
REPORT ON THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURT, FINDINGS OF FACT C(35) – (36), p. 11;
E(61), p. 14.
REPORT ON THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURT, PART C COMPLEMENTARY REFORM 2(c), p.
27; 2(e), p. 28.
REPORT #1 ON LANDLORD-TENANT COURT PROCEEDINGS IN INDIANA I(A), p. 6.
Adopted Oct. 15, 2012, effective March 1, 2013.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-28-53-marion-local-rules-2026-10-02
- Content hash
a516b2b29aeee0f8bd959f5cb28d95da1b019bcac558cbdcdf15e088dc939302
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.