IN · rules
Ind. Marion Cnty. Mass Tort Local Rule LR49-TR40 Rule 713
Trial Setting Criteria
A. Asbestos cases pending on the Marion County Mass Tort Litigation Docket shall be set
for trial pursuant to the following criteria, absent a written, verified showing of good cause:
1. Any case identified by the Court as an “exigent case” may receive a priority setting and
expedited trial date, in comparison with non-exigent cases.
2. No more than two “exigent cases”, as that term is defined in Rule 712, will be scheduled
for trial in any single trial setting.
3. Non-exigent cases will fill the remaining slots in a particular trial setting using cause
number order, beginning with a particular plaintiffs’ firm’s oldest pending cases and moving forward
according to cause number.
B. In the event that one or more cases set in any particular trial setting is not tried, settled,
dismissed or otherwise resolved:
1. The case shall roll over and displace the settings in that firm’s next trial setting.
2. Cases rolled over will be set for trial behind only exigent cases assigned to that trial setting
by the Court.
3. Cases that are rolled over will be assigned to that firm’s next trial setting in the same order
as originally scheduled for trial.
4. Any vacancies remaining in the new trial setting shall be filled according to the trial setting
criteria in section A of this Rule.
5. Cases displaced by the cases rolled over from the previous trial setting then become first
choice settings in that firm’s very next trial setting in the order that they were originally set for trial,
behind any exigent cases set for that day.
6. Any vacancies remaining in that trial setting shall be filled according to trial setting criteria
in section A of this Rule.
7. For good cause the Court may make exception to the number of cases set in a trial setting.
8. In the event that one exigent case rolls over from the previous trial setting and two exigent
cases are set for the next trial setting, no exigent case will be displaced, but all of the non-exigent cases
will roll over to the next trial setting.
C. Cases will be released from a trial setting by the Court as follows:
1. Four weeks before the first scheduled day of trial, the seventh and eighth choice settings
shall be released from the trial setting and roll over to the Plaintiff firm’s next trial setting.
2. Two weeks from the first scheduled day of trial, cases that are not first, second, or third
choices in the trial setting shall be released from the trial setting and roll over to the plaintiffs’ firm’s
next trial setting.
3. At Noon on the day before trial is set to begin, all cases but the first choice in the trial
setting shall be released from the trial setting and roll over to the plaintiffs’ firm’s next trial setting.
D. Once cases are assigned to a particular trial setting by the Court, the trial setting will not
be altered or modified without good cause shown, other than to accommodate cases rolling over from
previous trial settings, as described above.
E. A motion to continue trial may be made only by a written and verified motion pursuant to
T.R. 53.5, and will be granted only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances.
F. If a motion to continue trial is granted:
1. The case(s) affected by the motion to continue shall roll over to the plaintiffs’ firm’s next
trial setting immediately upon entry of the Court’s order granting the motion; and,
2. The case(s) affected shall roll over to the plaintiffs’ firm’s next trial setting in the same
order as previously set, in accordance with the provisions of this Rule.
G. For any case released from one trial setting and removed to another, all existing Case
Management Order deadlines for that case are vacated unless already expired before the motion to
continue was filed.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-28-53-marion-local-rules-2026-10-02
- Content hash
0b3498e10ea73dd2cc09ea11f49b4345e0ce0102997e428b046f18b7e932db54
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.