IN · rules
Ind. Marion Cnty. Crim. Local Rule LR49-CR00-112
Mandatory Consecutive Sentences
Where consecutive sentencing is mandated under I.C. § 35-50-1-2(d), the sentence
calling for more restrictive placement shall be served prior to any sentence for less
restrictive placement. For purpose of this rule, the following placements are listed in
order from most restrictive to least restrictive:
1. Incarceration at the Indiana Department of Corrections
2. Incarceration at the Marion County Adult Detention Center
3. Commitment to a Work Release Facility
3. Commitment to Marion County Community Corrections, Home Detention
Component
If the sentence calling for more restrictive sentencing is entered after the sentence for less
restrictive sentencing, the Judge ordering less restrictive placement shall issue an amended
abstract ordering such sentence to be served consecutive to the more restrictive placement.
The amended abstract shall be issued no more than ten (10) days following notice that a
more restrictive sentence has been entered.
Where terms of probation are mandated to run consecutively under I.C. § 35-50-1-2(d),
the term calling for the least restrictive conditions shall run consecutive to the term(s)
calling for more restrictive conditions. The Marion Superior Probation Department shall
make the determination as to which term of probation is most restrictive, and as to which
term shall be served first.
The Chair of the Criminal Division is authorized to issue any orders necessary to enforce
the provisions of this rule.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-28-53-marion-local-rules-2026-10-02
- Content hash
9d22566d2d8c2f3a80d9a67c0d734df4d2de5c56f1b5c22a467b84aa45cbc804
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.