IN · rules
Ind. Marion Cnty. Admin. Local Rule LR49-AR00-305
Budgetary Procedures
A. Budgets. The Executive Committee shall prepare and submit a unified budget for the
Court to be funded upon approval of the City-County Council.
B. Annual Procedure. Each year the Executive Committee shall establish a schedule
for the Court and its divisions to submit a proposed budget for budget preparation, review and
submission by the Executive Committee with the goal of providing for the effective functioning
of the Court, as follows:
1. Each judge and administrative officer shall submit written budget requests to
the Court Administrator.
2. The Executive Committee shall meet to review the budget requests and may
request further information from the judges and administrative officers or any
other source.
3. The Executive Committee shall establish and set budget priorities and direct
the Court Administrator to prepare the budget proposal for submission to the
City-County Council.
C. Allocation of Resources. The Executive Committee shall establish guidelines for
allocation of individual line items in the yearly budget approved by the City-County Council.
Each judge shall be allocated an adequate amount at the beginning of the year for office
expenses, including supplies, stationery, equipment, association dues, disciplinary fees and
travel.
D. Claims. All claims shall be submitted to the Court Administrator for review to
determine compliance with budgetary policies and guidelines approved by the Executive
Committee. The Court Administrator shall then forward all approved claims consistent with the
Executive Committee's policies and guidelines to the Marion County Auditor for payment. Any
claim or expenditures exceeding or otherwise inconsistent with budgetary policies or guidelines
must be submitted to the Executive Committee for approval prior to incurring any such expense.
No judge may individually approve any claim or expenditure, which exceeds the amount
allocated to each judge.
E. Transfers within Budget Character. If the Court Administrator, with the approval
of the judge, or a judge, determines that a transfer is necessary within budget characters and
within division, they shall have the authority to sign off on that transfer for submittal to the
Marion County Auditor.
F. Transfers between Budget Characters. If the Court Administrator, with the
approval of the judge, or a judge, determines that a transfer between budget characters is
necessary, a written proposal with explanation shall be submitted to the Executive Committee for
approval. Upon approval, determination will be made if a transfer is possible. This action
requires the approval of both division heads, and action by the City-County Council. If no
transfer is possible, a “Request for Fiscal Ordinance” will then be presented to the Marion
County Auditor for submission to the City-County Council.
G. Additional Appropriation. If the Court Administrator, with the approval of the
judge, or a judge, determines that an additional appropriation is necessary, a written proposal
shall be submitted to the Executive Committee for approval. Upon approval, determination will
be made if a transfer is possible. This action also requires the approval of both division heads. If
no transfer is possible, a “Request for Fiscal Ordinance” will be presented to the Marion County
Auditor for submission to the City-County Council.
H. Mandate. The Executive Committee shall exercise all mandates for the adequate
provision of court services, personnel or other expenditures.
I. Compliance with Laws. The Executive Committee and the Court Administrator
shall closely monitor all budget submissions, claims, expenditures and other financial records to
assure strict compliance with all laws, rules and regulations.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-28-53-marion-local-rules-2026-10-02
- Content hash
c527435e6f29d035587ff200eda4510f9237ab646c2f094d30105811135ac082
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.