IN · rules
Ind. Elkhart Cnty. Local Rule LR20-TR81.1-404
Family Court
404.1 Mission of Elkhart County Unified Family Court
The primary mission of the Elkhart County Unified Family Court is to provide a trauma-informed,
comprehensive, evidence-based, innovative court dedicated to child and family focused decision making
that results in outcomes that advance the needs of children and their families.
404.2 Definitions
404.2.1. Family
The Elkhart County Unified Family Court defines “family” for purposes of these rules in the
following manner:
1. “Family” shall include a child, any siblings related by blood, a parent’s marriage, or adoption to
that child, and the biological or adoptive parents of that child, and any legal guardian(s) or
custodian(s) of that child, and any step-parents or domestic partners of that child’s biological or
adoptive parent(s) who have any care or control of that child, or who have a significant relationship
with that child;
2. Persons who are married, or who live together in a domestic partnership, or who recently have
been or are currently in a significant relationship but do not live together and have a case in
common, who do not have children.
3. Any blood or adoptive family members living in the same household with any person from the
above two groups, including cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents; any blood family members
related to a non-blood family member of persons who reside together, such as a child’s stepsibling,
a parent’s girlfriend’s brother, etc.
404.2.2. Unified Family Court
A Unified Family Court is a court system which operates by hearing all cases related to family law,
and through either close coordination of its judicial officers or assigning one judicial officer to hear
all cases related to one family, works to improve outcomes for children, their families, and the court
itself. A Unified Family Court creates processes to expedite legal matters, therefore saving time and
resources for both the court and the families involved; creates partnerships with social service
organizations to enhance the wellbeing of court-involved families; and works to increase the overall
quality of the legal process for all parties.
404.2.3. Bundling
The process of identifying family cases and determining if TR 81.1 Family Procedures should be
utilized.
404.2.4. Triage
The process of Family Court staff assessing a family’s needs and risk factors by completing a Triage
Assessment to help determine which pathway the case(s) should be assigned to.
404.2.5. Pathway
One of three distinct tracks a family law case will be assigned to through the Triage process.
Assigning cases to a distinct Pathway helps to identify cases that can be resolved more quickly, versus
cases that require more judicial time, oversight, and intervention. The three (3) pathways utilized by
the Elkhart County Unified Family Court are Streamlined, Tailored, and Judicial/Specialized.
404.2.6. Family Needs Interview
An interview conducted by the Family Court Coordinator, or other designated Family Court Staff,
in cases assigned to the Judicial/Specialized Pathway, with the express purpose of gathering more
in-depth personal and collateral information on families in order to provide the Court with general
case recommendations and recommendations for a family’s participation in therapeutic services.
404.2.7. Family Needs ReportA document produced as a result of the Family Needs Interview
process that summarizes the history of the case, the background of the family, collateral
information about the family, concerns for the family, and recommendations for the case.
404.3. Identification of Family Cases
Upon the filing of any case or the filing in an existing case, in the Family Division, the Clerk or other
individual identified by the Court shall conduct a name search, the results of that name search shall be
provided to the judicial officer to whom the filing is assigned and shall ensure that family members are
appropriately linked in the Odyssey court system. The Family Court Coordinator, or other designated
Family Court Staff, shall then be responsible for completing a Triage Assessment, assigning cases to
judicial officers based upon whether any other open family cases are already being heard within the
Family Division, and preparing a proposed Pathway and Scheduling Order. The assigned Judicial Officer
shall determine if Trial Rule 81.1 Family Procedures should be followed. That Judicial Officer should
consult with any other Judicial Officer that may already be hearing other cases concerning the same
family and determine if bundling should occur and if so, which Judicial Officer should proceed with the
bundled cases or in the alternative to bundling close coordination of the cases. If bundling family
procedures occurs the court shall issue an order in all bundled related cases pursuant to Trial Rule 81.1.
The Judge of Superior Court 6 has final authority on bundling.
The Elkhart Office of Family Court Services has the authority to issue required forms in this process.
404.4. Consideration of Bundling
Any party, including by not limited to Guardian Ad Litem. CASA, attorney’s representing a party, or any
other professional involved with the children and family may initiate a request for review of cases for
bundling. Such Motion for Consideration of Bundling should be filed in each case contemplated for
bundling.
The Elkhart Office of Family Court Services has the authority to issue required forms.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-28-21-elkhart-local-rules-2026-01-01
- Content hash
43e9115337be58bd3086140ed4a5a91c144f5c7712268e871b92d87d73696047
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.