IN · rules
Ind. Allen Cnty. Fam. Local Rule LR02-JV00-38
Children in Need of Services – Facilitation of Initial Hearings and Dispositional Hearings
A. Facilitation – Immediately preceding the Initial Hearing on a petition to
adjudicate a child to be a child in need of services, or at a time otherwise directed by
the court, a facilitation shall be
conducted.
B. Facilitation defined – Facilitation is a confidential process in which a
neutral third person, appointed by the court, acts to encourage and to assist the
parties in achieving a non-adversarial resolution to the allegations set forth in the
petition alleging the child to be a child in need of services. The facilitator assists
the parties in problem identification and resolution. During the facilitation process,
the parties may agree to orally amend the allegations of the petition and the terms
of the proposed plan for parent participation. The facilitator will assist the parties in
resolving issues regarding the child’s placement; the plan for visitation by the
parent, guardian, and/or custodian; the responsibilities, duties and requisite
services for the family’s care,
treatment and rehabilitation; the roles of other individuals in the family’s
rehabilitation; and other matters relative insuring the child’s protection and
best interests.
C. Participants to the facilitation – The parent, guardian and/or custodian;
the attorney representing the parent, guardian, and or custodian; the guardian
ad litem or court appointed special advocate; the county Department of Child
Services shall participate in the facilitation process. The child shall attend the
facilitation if the child’s guardian ad litem or court appointed special advocate
believes it is in the child’s best interests to attend and believes the child to be of
suitable age and maturity to participate. The child’s relatives; the foster parent;
persons providing support for the parent, guardian or custodian; and/or other
persons who have significant or caretaking relationships to the child may be in
attendance at the facilitation unless excluded by the court. Facilitations are not
otherwise open to the public except as may be approved by the court for the
purposes of training or research.
D. Facilitation Procedure – All cases pending an Initial Hearing shall be first
submitted for facilitation. All parties are required to mediate the issues in good faith but
are not compelled to reach an agreement. The facilitator shall first determine whether
the parties named in the petition have been apprised of their rights. Any request for the
appointment of pauper counsel shall be completed in writing on a form prescribed by
the court and submitted to a judge or magistrate for a ruling prior to the
start of the facilitation. The facilitator shall explain the process and identify the issues
that are to be discussed in facilitation. Each allegation of the petition alleging the child
to be a child in need of services shall be reviewed. Parties shall be given an
opportunity to explain their position with regard to each allegation. Where appropriate
and, by agreement of the parties, the allegation may be amended. Once the petition is
facilitated, the facilitator shall assist the participants in determining the nature and types
of services in which the child or parent, guardian, custodian, or other person should be
required to participate. Agreements reported to the court following facilitation must be
based on the autonomous decisions of the parties and not the decisions of the
facilitator.
The facilitator shall orally present the facilitation report to the court at the Initial
Hearing and, if appropriate, the Dispositional Hearing. The report shall include a
recitation of the parties’ respective admissions and denials to the allegations of the
allegations of the petition, the parties’ agreement for provisional orders, parent
participation plan and/or dispositional decree and a statement of unresolved
issues. At the Initial Hearing, the court will confirm with the parties and the
participants the terms of the facilitated agreement. The Court may adopt the parties’
agreement as orders of the court if it determines the agreement is in the best interests
of the child. Issues that are not resolved through facilitation or not adopted as an order
of the court may be referred back by the court for additional facilitation, may be
resolved by order of the court based on a summary presentation,
or may be scheduled by the court for a subsequent hearing or fact finding. The rules
of evidence do not apply in facilitation.
E. Termination of Facilitation – The facilitator may terminate facilitation
whenever the facilitator believes that continuation of the process would harm or
prejudice the child or one or more of the
parties. The facilitator may bifurcate the process whenever the facilitator
determines that due to a party’s history of domestic violence would impede
another party’s ability to openly discuss issues should the other person be
present.
F. Confidentiality – Statements and issues discussed in facilitation are
confidential and may not be used as statements against interest or otherwise against a
party in any Initial Hearing, fact
finding, or pending or impending civil or criminal trial unless consent by the
declarant is given. Facilitators shall not be subject to process requiring the
disclosure of any matter discussed during the facilitation, but rather, such matter
shall be considered confidential and privileged in nature. The confidentiality
requirement may not be waived by the parties, and an objection to the obtaining
of testimony or physical evidence from facilitation may be made by any party or
by the facilitators.
G. Qualification of Facilitators – All facilitators shall be appointed by the court.
In determining the appointment of a facilitator, the court may require the following
training to be completed:
A series of court-approved classes or seminars on the principles of Family
Group Decision Making and/or dependency mediation as offered by the court,
the American Humane Association, model courts designated by the National
Counsel of Juvenile and Family Court Judges; or dependency mediation
courses that may be offered by the Association of Family and Conciliation
Courts;
Classes or seminars on the law governing children in need of services;
Classes or seminars on issues related to poverty, racial and cultural diversity,
strength based practices, and positive youth development; and, In addition to the
foregoing, the court may require a facilitator to complete Alternative Dispute
Resolution training as set forth in Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule 2.5
H. Appointment of Pauper Counsel – Any party requesting appointment of
paper council in any case shall complete a questionnaire prescribed by the court that
requests information regarding
the applicant’s employment, earnings, financial resources, education, training, age,
family composition, disabilities, or other information necessary for the court to
consider the applicant’s eligibility for the appointment of pauper counsel. After
considering the complexities of the factual and legal issues in this case, the likelihood
of the applicant’s ability to prevail on the merits of the case, the ability of the
applicant to investigate and present the applicant’s claims and/or defenses without an
attorney, and the opportunity for facilitation/mediation, the court will enter findings and
order that determines whether the applicant has sufficient means to defend or prosecute
the case. Based on it findings, the court may appoint pauper counsel who will be fully or
partially compensated by the court. The court may require the applicant to pay and be
responsible for all or part of the pauper counsel’s fees.
I. Attorney Guardian ad Litem and Pauper Counsel Fees – Services by
attorneys appointed by the court to serve as paper counsel or as a guardian ad litem
shall be deemed quasi pro bono and
shall be paid upon submission of a claim for services as restricted by the court’s fee
schedule.
The fee schedule will be based upon an hourly fee as set forth in the court’s order of
appointment. With the exception of costs of copying and postage, any fees or costs
not set out in the fee schedule must be pre-approved by the court. By acceptance of
appointment the court appointed counsel agrees to abide by the fee schedule
established by the court and further agrees to timely submit all claims for payment.
Claims for payment should be submitted on the day services are rendered unless other
arrangements are made with the court. Any claims for fee not submitted within thirty
(30) days from the date the services were rendered will be deemed waived and such
services will be regarded as rendered entirely pro bono.
Provenance
- Source
- www.in.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-28-02-allen-local-rules-2016-02-01
- Content hash
95c3e65804599882095f24709a464a56738f231b11e3f3d526d70e5f949ae831
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.