Bindinglaw

IN · rules

Ind. Evidence Rule 901

Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

activein force · 2026-07-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Effective January 1, 2014

(a) In General.

To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must

produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.

(b) Examples.

The following are examples only, not a complete list, of evidence that satisfies the requirement:

(1) Testimony of a Witness with Knowledge.

Testimony that an item is what it is claimed to be, by a witness with knowledge.

(2) Nonexpert Opinion About Handwriting.

A nonexpert's opinion that handwriting is genuine, based on a familiarity with it that was not

acquired for the current litigation.

(3) Comparison by an Expert Witness or the Trier of Fact.

A comparison with an authenticated specimen by an expert witness or the trier of fact.

(4) Distinctive Characteristics and the Like.

The appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of the

item, taken together with all the circumstances.

(5) Opinion About a Voice.

An opinion identifying a person's voice whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic

transmission or recording based on hearing the voice at any time under circumstances that connect

it with the alleged speaker.

(6) Evidence About a Telephone Conversation.

For a telephone conversation, evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time to:

(A) a particular person, if circumstances, including self-identification, show that the person

answering was the one called; or

(B) a particular business, if the call was made to a business and the call related to business reas-

onably transacted over the telephone.

(7) Evidence About Public Records.

Evidence that:

(A) a document was recorded or filed in a public office as authorized by law; or

(B) a purported public record or statement is from the office where items of this kind are kept.

(8) Evidence About Ancient Documents or Data Compilations.

For a document or data compilation, evidence that it:

(A) is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity;

(B) was in a place where, if authentic, it would likely be; and

(C) is at least thirty (30) years old when offered.

(9) Evidence About a Process or System.

Evidence describing a process or system and showing that it produces an accurate result.

(10) Methods Provided by a Statute or Rule.

Any method of authentication or identification allowed by a statute, by the Supreme Court of this

State, or by the Constitution of this State.

Provenance

Source
rules.incourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-in-06-2026-07-01
Content hash
1590c6508999c21283cd0831b0fdce86790365f096e2702bd2bd1b44c9a238cc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.