IN · rules
Ind. Appellate Rule 32
Correction Or Modification Of Clerk's Record
Or Transcript
Effective January 1, 2001
A. Submission of Disagreement Regarding Contents to Trial Court or
Administrative Agency.
If a disagreement arises as to whether the Clerk's Record or Transcript accurately discloses
what occurred in the trial court or the Administrative Agency, any party may move the trial
court or the Administrative Agency to resolve the disagreement. The trial court retains jur-
isdiction to correct or modify the Clerk's Record or Transcript at any time before the reply
brief is due to be filed. After that time, the movant must request leave of the Court on Appeal
to correct or modify the Clerk's Record or Transcript. The trial court or Administrative Agency
shall issue an order, which shall become part of the Clerk's Record, that either:
(1) confirms that the Clerk's Record or Transcript reflects what actually occurred; or
(2) corrects the Clerk's Record or Transcript, including the chronological case summary if
necessary; to reflect what actually occurred.
B. Transmission of Order.
The trial court clerk shall transmit to the Court on Appeal:
(1) the trial court's order or order of an Administrative Agency and any corrections to the
Clerk's Record; and
(2) any corrections to the Transcript by means of a supplemental Transcript. See Rule 9(G).
The title of any corrected Transcript shall indicate that it is a corrected Transcript.
Provenance
- Source
- rules.incourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-02-2026-07-01
- Content hash
14da5e3173bd24851bf4e58cca966eade42d0a5aeea3e6fd1dcd73dad4b415fd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.