IN · rules
Ind. ADR Rule 7.6
Subsequent Proceedings
Effective March 1, 1997
(A) An individual may not serve as a neutral in any dispute on which another neutral has
already been serving without first ascertaining that the current neutral has been notified of
the desired change.
(B) A person who has served as a mediator in a proceeding may act as a neutral in subsequent disputes between the parties, and the parties may provide for a review of the agreement with the neutral on a periodic basis. However, the neutral shall decline to act in any
capacity except as a neutral unless the subsequent association is clearly distinct from the
issues involved in the alternative dispute resolution process. The neutral is required to utilize
an effective system to identify potential conflict of interest at the time of appointment. The
neutral may not subsequently act as an investigator for any court-ordered report or make
any recommendations to the Court regarding the mediated litigation.
(C) When multiple ADR processes are contemplated, a neutral must afford the parties an
opportunity to select another neutral for the subsequent procedures.
Provenance
- Source
- rules.incourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-in-12-2025-01-01
- Content hash
b36b2b9dc9771ba1d2c432a761dcc834614282c18a8d8b34d5b1b7a069249171
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.