Bindinglaw

IL · rules

Ill. S. Ct. R. 88

Scheduling of Hearings

activein force · 2021-10-01 – presentact-effective-date

The procedure for fixing the date, time and place of a hearing before a panel of arbitrators

shall be prescribed by circuit rule provided that not less than 60 days’ notice in writing shall be

given to the parties or their attorneys of record. The hearing shall be held on the scheduled date

and within one year of the date of filing of the action, unless continued by the court upon good

cause shown. The hearing shall be held at a location provided or auth orized by the court or

remotely, including by telephone or video conference.

History

Adopted May 20, 1987, effective June 1, 1987; amended Sept. 29, 2021, eff. Oct. 1, 2021. Committee Comments Each circuit engaged in a mandatory arbitration program is best suited to determine the scheduling of hearings to accommodate its case-flow needs and the availability of arbitrator personnel. The Philadelphia program is eminently successful in achieving an efficient program-at the time it is filed, a case in the arbitration track is assigned a hearing date eight months from the date of filing. Philadelphia has a central facility styled “Arbitration Center,” in an office building in the city center, a short distance from most other court facilities. The eight- month period has proved to be sufficient to enable the parties to complete their discovery and preparation for hearing. Most matters scheduled for arbitration are settled prior to hearing. The time within which matters in arbitration should be heard is not intended to be a period of limitations but rather a reasonable expectation. Every jurisdiction studied, many with higher monetary limits for arbitrability, have reported that these cases can be h eard within the period of one year without prejudice to the parties. Experience dictates that the use of courthouse facilities provides a desirable quasi-judicial atmosphere and a ready access to the court for timely rulings. A centralized operation of the program provides greater efficiency in the use of arbitrator’s and attorney’s time. A central facility also results in better monitoring of the progress of a case diverted to arbitration.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
e85f0fdf7f8d3843ad16c044977cf1e0ff86782350129e212ef5ac77d92cd08b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. S. Ct. R. 88 — Scheduling of Hearings · binding.law