IL · rules
Ill. S. Ct. R. 430
Trial of Incarcerated Defendant
An accused shall not be placed in restraint of any form unless there is a manifest need for
restraint to protect the security of the court, the proceedings, or to prevent escape. Persons charged
with a criminal offense are presumed innocent until otherwise proven guilty and are entitled to
participate in their defense as free persons before the jury or bench. Any deviation from this right
shall be based on evidence specifically considered by the trial court on a case-by-case basis. The
determination of whether to impose a physical restraint shall be limited to trial proceedings in
which the defendant’s innocence or guilt is to be determined, and does not apply to bond hearings
or other instances where the defendant may be required to appear before the court prior to a trial
being commenced. Once the trial judge becomes aware of restraints, prior to allowing the
defendant to appear before the jury, he or she shall conduct a separate hearing on the record to
investigate the need for such restraints. At such hearing, the trial court shall consider and shall
make specific findings as to:
(1) the seriousness of the present charge against the defendant;
(2) defendant’s temperament and character k nown to the trial court either by observation
or by the testimony of witnesses;
(3) defendant’s age and physical attributes;
(4) defendant’s past criminal record and, more particularly, whether such record contains
crimes of violence;
(5) defendant’s past escapes, attempted escapes, or evidence of any present plan to escape;
(6) evidence of any threats made by defendant to harm others, cause a disturbance, or to
be self-destructive;
(7) evidence of any risk of mob violence or of attempted revenge by others;
(8) evidence of any possibility of any attempt to rescue the defendant by others;
(9) size and mood of the audience;
(10) physical security of the courtroom, including the number of entrances and exits, the
number of guards necessary to provide se curity, and the adequacy and availability of
alternative security arrangements.
After allowing the defendant to be heard and after making specific findings, the trial judge shall
balance these findings and impose the use of a restraint only where the need for restraint outweighs
the defendant’s right to be free from restraint.
History
Adopted March 22, 2010, effective July 1, 2010. Commentary (March 22, 2010) This rule codifies the holdings in People v. Boose, 66 Ill. 2d 261 (1977), and People v. Allen, 222 Ill. 2d 340 (2006).
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
8735ec8cedafb7e71250127eb233f16bc2734319f8edfb5bdd97c2199d08201f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.