Bindinglaw

IL · rules

Ill. S. Ct. R. 430

Trial of Incarcerated Defendant

activein force · 2021-05-19 – presentact-effective-date

An accused shall not be placed in restraint of any form unless there is a manifest need for

restraint to protect the security of the court, the proceedings, or to prevent escape. Persons charged

with a criminal offense are presumed innocent until otherwise proven guilty and are entitled to

participate in their defense as free persons before the jury or bench. Any deviation from this right

shall be based on evidence specifically considered by the trial court on a case-by-case basis. The

determination of whether to impose a physical restraint shall be limited to trial proceedings in

which the defendant’s innocence or guilt is to be determined, and does not apply to bond hearings

or other instances where the defendant may be required to appear before the court prior to a trial

being commenced. Once the trial judge becomes aware of restraints, prior to allowing the

defendant to appear before the jury, he or she shall conduct a separate hearing on the record to

investigate the need for such restraints. At such hearing, the trial court shall consider and shall

make specific findings as to:

(1) the seriousness of the present charge against the defendant;

(2) defendant’s temperament and character k nown to the trial court either by observation

or by the testimony of witnesses;

(3) defendant’s age and physical attributes;

(4) defendant’s past criminal record and, more particularly, whether such record contains

crimes of violence;

(5) defendant’s past escapes, attempted escapes, or evidence of any present plan to escape;

(6) evidence of any threats made by defendant to harm others, cause a disturbance, or to

be self-destructive;

(7) evidence of any risk of mob violence or of attempted revenge by others;

(8) evidence of any possibility of any attempt to rescue the defendant by others;

(9) size and mood of the audience;

(10) physical security of the courtroom, including the number of entrances and exits, the

number of guards necessary to provide se curity, and the adequacy and availability of

alternative security arrangements.

After allowing the defendant to be heard and after making specific findings, the trial judge shall

balance these findings and impose the use of a restraint only where the need for restraint outweighs

the defendant’s right to be free from restraint.

History

Adopted March 22, 2010, effective July 1, 2010. Commentary (March 22, 2010) This rule codifies the holdings in People v. Boose, 66 Ill. 2d 261 (1977), and People v. Allen, 222 Ill. 2d 340 (2006).

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
8735ec8cedafb7e71250127eb233f16bc2734319f8edfb5bdd97c2199d08201f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.