IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 9.34
Issues In Sexual Relations Within Families
To sustain the charge of sexual relations within families, the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant committed an act of sexual penetration upon ____;
and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knew that [(he) (she)] was related to ____ as [
(brother) (sister)] either of the whole-blood or of the half-blood.
[or]
First Proposition: That the defendant committed an act of sexual penetration upon ____;
and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knew that [(he) (she)] was related to ____ as [
(father) (mother)] regardless of legitimacy and regardless of whether ____ is of the whole -blood
or adopted; and
Third Proposition: That ____ was 18 years of age or over when the act was committed.
[or]
First Proposition: That the defendant committed an act of sexual penetration upon ____;
and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knew that [(he) (she)] was related to ____ as [
(stepfather) (stepmother)]; and
Third Proposition: That ____ was 18 years of age or over when the act was committed.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each of these propositions has
been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
828ad7c850ec56b5529156d1e2ae2e2c9527eab6bbc30c6224cf07042a407a56
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.