IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 9.26
Issues In Juvenile Pimping [Or Pimping For Institutionalized Mentally Retarded Person]
To sustain the charge of juvenile pimping, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant received any money, property, token, object, or
article or anything of value from a prostitute; and
Second Proposition: That there was no lawful consideration for the defendant's receipt of
the money, property, token, object, or article or thing of value; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant knew that the money, property, token, object, or
article or thing of value was earned in whole or in part from the practice of prostitution; and
Fourth Proposition: That the prostitute was [(under the age of 16 years) (an
institutionalized severely or profoundly mentally retarded person)] at the time the defendant
received the money, property, token, object, or article or thing of value[; and
Fifth Proposition: That the defendant did not reasonably believe that the prostitute was [
(of the age of 16 years or older) (not an institutionalized severely or profoundly mentally
retarded person)]].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
15ba6f87e477e0342f56e2aea9baf586b7424a8c0969e8170ecb2f404c1f3a68
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.