IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 8.24A
Issues In Unlawful Visitation Or Parenting Time Interference
Third Proposition: That the defendant did not reasonably believe there was imminent
physical harm against [(child)] and that the defendant’s conduct in withholding [(visitation
rights) (parenting time) (custody time)] was not reasonable.
[or]
Third Proposition: That the defendant did not act with the mutual consent of all parties
having a right to custody and [(visitation of) (parenting time with)] [(child)].
[or]
Third Proposition: That the defendant's actions were not otherwise authorized by law.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
df35647053b214193316b9b26889d7e8c66be30f1f7212dd57618d500f5187c6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.