IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 7.30
Issues In Drug Induced Homicide--Delivery Of Objects Or Segregated Parts Containing
LSD
To sustain the charge of drug induced homicide, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition : That the defendant knowingly delivered to another more than 10 [
(objects) (segregated parts of an object)] containing in them or having on them any amount of
any substance containing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); and
Second Proposition: That any person [(injected) (inhaled) (ingested)] any amount of that
LSD; and
Third Proposition: That ____ died as a result of that [(injection) (inhalation) (ingestion)
].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
ffc78f80a5c71c2087425bcbf99d0001d637c79b0e41ea77968daee34940d673
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.