IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 7.28
Issues In Drug Induced Homicide--Delivery Of Controlled Substances
To sustain the charge of drug induced homicide, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly delivered to another a substance
containing _____, a controlled substance; and
Second Proposition: That any person [(injected) (inhaled) (absorbed) (ingested)] any
amount of that controlled substance; and
Third Proposition: That _____ death was caused by that [(injection) (inhalation)
(absorption) (ingestion)].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the def endant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
911f7f406baaef1304baee3a59e7c595fde20b597f5c6d89be055334da9e4f94
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.