Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 7.19B

Issues In Voluntary Manslaughter Of An Unborn Child—Provocation By A Person Other

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

Than The Pregnant Woman—Transferred Intent

To sustain the charge of voluntary manslaughter of an unborn child, the State must prove

the following propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant performed the acts which caused the death of the

unborn child of ____; and

Second Proposition: That when the defendant did so, he

[1] intended to kill or do great bodily harm to a person other than ____;

[or]

[2] knew that his acts would cause death to a person other than ____;

[or]

[3] knew that his acts created a strong probability of death or great bodily harm to a

person other than _____;

and

Third Proposition: That the defendant, at the time he performed the acts which caused the

death of the unborn child of ____, acted under a sudden and intense passion resulting from

serious provocation by the person he endeavors to kill, but he negligently or accidentally killed

the unborn child of ____.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
c97cec60c5150cfc5105e79102420a6b7622710bfd18f03e7ef2ce37b59b9c70
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 7.19B · binding.law