IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 3.20
Use Of Transcripts Of Tape-Recorded English Conversations
[(A) (An)] [(electronic) (________)] recording has been admitted into evidence. In
addition to the [(electronic) (________)] recording you are being given a transcript of the
[(electronic) (________)] recording. The transcript only represents what the transcriber believes
was said on the [(electronic) (________)] recording, and merely serves as an aid when you listen
to the [(electronic) (_______)] recording. The [(electronic) (_______)] recording, and not the
transcript, is the evidence. If you perceive a conflict between the [(electronic) (_______)]
recording and the transcript, the [(electronic) (_______)] controls.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
443739c3d648b7e2a80cf576ce4114e5d3b2d553b741c5d5642aef7b4b8f85c3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.