IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.76F
Issues In Aggravated Driving With A Drug, Substance, Or Compound In Breath,
Blood, Or Urine--Driving A School Bus With Persons 18 Years Of Age Or Younger On
Board
To sustain the charge of aggravated driving with a drug, substance, or compound in
breath, blood, or urine, the State must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant drove a school bus; and
Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove a school bus, there was any
amount of a drug, substance, or compound in his breath, blood, or urine resulting from the
unlawful use or consumption of [(cannabis) (____, a controlled substance) (an intoxicating
compound) (methamphetamine)]; and
Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove a school bus, there were persons
18 years of age or younger on board.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
5b6c22f2085d3aa52ef92cc7f0e57f66cd97ba165d6534fabaead2700ed7880b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.