Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.76D

Issues In Aggravated Driving With A Drug, Substance, Or Compound In Breath,

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

Blood, Or Urine--Driving Without Liability Insurance

To sustain the charge of aggravated driving with a drug, substance, or compound in

breath, blood, or urine, the State must prove the following propositions:

First Proposition : That the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical control of)] a

vehicle; and

Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical

control of)] a vehicle, there was any amount of a drug, substance, or compound in his breath,

blood, or urine resulting from the unlawful consumption of [(cannabis) (____, a controlled

substance) (any intoxicating compound) (methamphetamine); and

Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(drove)(was in actual physical control

of)] a vehicle, the defendant [(knew)(should have known)] that the vehicle he was [(driving) (in

actual physical control of)] was not covered by a liability insurance policy.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
af9474bbb315b4af67cb59d755bd2f6b47d9e06faafa48e00e03673ad495d357
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.