IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.76C
Issues In Aggravated Driving With A Drug, Substance, Or Compound In Breath,
Blood, Or Urine--Accident While Driving In A School Speed Zone As Enhancing Factor
To sustain the charge of aggravated driving with a drug, substance, or compound in
breath, blood or urine when there is an accident while driving in a school speed zone, the State
must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant drove a vehicle at any speed in a school speed zone
at a time when a speed limit of 20 miles per hour was in effect; and
Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove a vehicle there was any amount
of a drug, substance, or compound in his breath, blood or urine resulting from the unlawful use
or consumption of [(cannabis) (____, a controlled substance) (an intoxicating compound)
(methamphetamine)]; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant, in so driving a vehicle, was involved in a motor
vehicle accident; and
Fourth Proposition: That the accident in which defendant was involved resulted in bodily
harm to another person; and
Fifth Proposition: That the defendant's driving a vehicle while there was any amount of a
drug, substance, or compound in his breath, blood, or urine resulting from the unlawful use or
consumption of [(cannabis) (____, a controlled substance) (an intoxicating compound)
(methamphetamine)] was a proximate cause of the bodily harm.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
2108d86f3980cfeb94af8c2bce407b788d81b4a84263e8b4f452aeda1435ca5a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.