IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.74
Issues In Possession Or Use Of Radar Detection Devices
To sustain the charge of possession or use of a radar detection device, the State must
prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant [(operated) (was in actual physical control of )] a
commercial motor vehicle; and
Second Proposition: That the commercial motor vehicle was equipped with any
instrument designed to detect the presence of police radar for the purpose of monitoring
vehicular speed.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
d6e1faeabee19a7b840f09e1fbb137cf48e92aa7413b0f968e2e3854226dd738
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.