IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.72D
Issues In Aggravated Driving Under The Influence Of Drugs--Driving Without
Liability Insurance
To sustain the charge of aggravated driving under the influence of drugs, the State must
prove the following propositions:
First Proposition : That the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical control of)] a
vehicle; and
Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical
control of)] a vehicle, the defendant was under the influence of any drug or combination of drugs
to a degree which rendered the defendant incapable of safely driving; and
Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical control
of)] a vehicle, the defendant [(knew) (should have known)] that the vehicle he was [(driving) (in
actual physical control of)] was not covered by a liability insurance policy.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
0ebc4dd0fbdc210b5a5cdce593f8d0929e222fa9c94cd420633d4f11d7d476a8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.