IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.66C
Issues In Aggravated Driving With An Alcohol Concentration Of 0.08 Or More--
Accident While Driving In A School Speed Zone As Enhancing Factor
To sustain the charge of aggravated driving with an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more
when there is a motor vehicle accident while driving in a school speed zone, the State must prove
the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant drove a vehicle at any speed in a school speed zone
at a time when a speed limit of 20 miles per hour was in effect; and
Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove a vehicle the alcohol
concentration in the defendant's blood or breath was 0.08 or more; and
Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove a vehicle the defendant was
involved in a motor vehicle accident; and
Fourth Proposition: That the accident in which defendant was involved resulted in bodily
harm to another person; and
Fifth Proposition: That the defendant's act of driving a vehicle while the alcohol
concentration in his blood or breath is 0.08 or more was a proximate cause of the bodily harm.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
4f5fc0c407e482cde5d3b373250665efeb3a14f8c34082dc1fe666a4fef731a9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.