IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.66A
Issues In Speeding While Passing School
To sustain the charge of speeding while passing a school, the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant drove a motor vehicle at a speed in excess of 20
miles per hour; and
Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove the motor vehicle he was
[(passing through a school zone) (traveling on a roadway on public school property) (upon any
public thoroughfare where children pass going to and from school)]; and
Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove the motor vehicle it was a school
day between the hours of 7 a.m. and 4 p.m.; and
Fourth Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove the motor vehicle school
children were present and so close thereto that a potential hazard existed because of the close
proximity of the motorized traffic; and
Fifth Proposition: That at the time the defendant drove the motor vehicle appropriate
signs had been posted and maintained upon the streets and highways which gave proper due
warning that a school zone was being approached and which indicated the school zone and the
maximum speed limit in effect during school days when school children are present.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
0afcaed50c058c5fc8353027506c2609e010f20676dcf67d98213d39d9fbb5f7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.