IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 23.16
Issues In Driving Under The Influence Of Drugs
To sustain the charge of driving under the influence of drugs, the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical control of )] a
vehicle; and
Second Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(drove) (was in actual physical
control of)] a vehicle, the defendant was under the influence of any drug or combination of drugs
to a degree which rendered the defendant incapable of safely driving.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
34eff9058ee41db3feba5798dd6167dac134d120b999486c352c8aab2a05a719
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.