IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 22.52
Issues In Tampering With Public Notice
To sustain the charge of tampering with a public notice, the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly and without lawful authority [(altered)
(destroyed) (defaced) (removed) (concealed)] a public notice; and
Second Proposition: That the notice had been posted according to law; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant did so during the time for which the notice was to
remain posted.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
1f34a023b8e1a987aef8c7e95f5092d9be18fcc064b0afbbcc020ebc58324afb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.