IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 22.12X
Issues In Harassment Of A Juror Or Witness--Conveying A Threat (Until January
1, 1995)
To sustain the charge of harassment of a [(juror) (witness )], the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant conveyed a threat of injury or damage to the
property or person of [(____) (any relative of ____)]; and
Second Proposition: That ____[(served as a juror) (served as a witness) (was expected to
serve as a witness in a pending legal proceeding)].
Third Proposition: That the defendant conveyed the threat with the intent to harass or
annoy ____ because of the [(verdict returned by the jury or the participation of ____ in the
verdict) (testimony of ____) (potential testimony of ____)].
If you find from your consideration of all of the evidence that each one of these
propositions has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all of the evidence that any one of these
propositions has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not
guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
2661f023a410fc14e96db7acb8b21493f27101c991f05b56ca6da5490f2bca1f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.