IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 22.06
Issues In Subornation Of Perjury
To sustain the charge of subornation of perjury, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(procured) (induced)] ____ to make [(a
false statement) (contradictory statements)] under [(oath) (affirmation)]; and
Second Proposition: That the [(false statement) (contradictory statements)] [(was)
(were)] material to the issue or point in question; and
Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(procured) (induced)] ____ to make a
false statement the defendant did not believe the statement(s) to be true.
[or]
Third Proposition: That at the time the defendant [(procured) (induced)] ____ to make
contradictory statements he did not believe both statements to be true.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
856f96921d2ad400892957215724e30349f6d56f4f0ce5237765030994e8df52
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.