IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 21.15
Definition Of Official Misconduct
A [(publ
ic officer) (public employee) (special government agent)] commits the offense of
official misconduct when, in his official capacity, he
[1] [
(intentionally) (recklessly)] fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law.
[or]
[2] knowi
ngly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform.
[or]
[3] per
forms an act in excess of his lawful authority with intent to obtain a personal
advantage for [(himself) (another)].
[or]
[4] [(soli
cits) (knowingly accepts)] a fee or reward which he knows is not authorized by
law, for the performance of any act.
Commi
ttee Note
720 ILCS 5/33-3(a), 2-17, and 2-18 (West 2019), as amended by P.A. 94-0338, effective
January 1, 2006.
Give I
nstruction 21.16.
When the
charge involves a public employee, give Instruction 4.11, defining “public
employee”.
When the
charge involves a public officer, give Instruction 4.12, defining “public
officer”.
When the
charge involves a special government agent, give Instruction 4.12A, defining
“special government agent”.
Use app
licable bracketed material.
The bra
cketed numbers are present solely for the guidance of court and counsel and
should not be included in the instruction submitted to the jury.
____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
7a4af51e58e2660eba2377f15142d3ea590df60cbcfef7709cc114b0222e2828
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.