Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 20.08

Issues In Syndicated Gambling--Bookmaking

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

To sustain the charge of syndicated gambling, the State must prove the following

propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant received or accepted more than five bets or wagers

upon the result of ____; and

Second Proposition: That such bets or wagers were of such size that the total amount of

money paid or promised to be paid to defendant exceeded $2,000.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
24b2f7113be83e065d60f884585e9a5860538a0f51444e257614659fab96d8a6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.