IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.00
BURDEN OF PROOF
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
The instructions in this chapter deal with the indictment, information or complaint,
burden of proof, and the presumption of innocence. One of the 2.01 et seq. instructions,
Instruction 2.02, and one of the 2.03 et seq. instructions must be given in all cases. Instruction
2.04 should be given only at the defendant's request, and then it must be given.
The Committee is aware of instances where a confused jury has returned logically or
legally inconsistent verdicts. (For examples of problems the Committee is seeking to avoid, see
People v. Hoffer, 106 Ill.2d 186, 478 N.E.2d 335, 88 Ill.Dec. 20 (1985), cert. denied 474 U.S.
847, 106 S.Ct. 139, 88 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (guilty of murder, voluntary manslaughter, and
involuntary manslaughter), People v. Spears, 130 Ill.App.3d 1006, 475 N.E.2d 8, 86 Ill.Dec . 202
(3d Dist.1985), judgment affirmed 112 Ill.2d 396, 493 N.E.2d 1030, 98 Ill.Dec. 9 (1986) (guilty
of attempt murder, armed violence, and reckless conduct), and People v. Coleman, 131
Ill.App.3d 76, 475 N.E.2d 565, 86 Ill.Dec. 351 (1st Dist.1985) (guilty of attempt murder and
reckless conduct).) To avoid such confusion in future cases, the Committee has expanded the
concluding instructions (Instruction 26.01 et seq. ) to be given to the jury and has made those
instructions more specific depending upon the particular charges to be considered by the jury and
the relationship of those charges to each other.
As part of the Committee's plan to avoid jury confusion, the Committee has similarly
expanded Chapter 2.00. Thus the form of the 2.01 charging instruction should always correlate to
the form of the 26.01 concluding instruction. [Example: if Instruction 2.01E is given, then
Instruction 26.01E must be given as well.]
The Committee is aware that choosing among the 2.01 et seq. instructions at first may
seem confusing and difficult. However, the Committee decided that having these options
available to cover as many fact situations as possible would ultimately prove to be of great
benefit to the bench and bar. Were these options not available, counsel and the court would be
required in an appropriate case to concoct modifications of those instructions in IPI -Criminal
closest to the case at hand. Devising instructions in the midst of a complex, perhaps hard- fought
trial is not a desirable course of action. It is far preferable to permit the court and counsel to
choose from among the detailed instructions provided by the Committee to meet almost any fact
situation that might arise.
In the 28 instructions that comprise the 2.01 series, the Committee has attempted to
provide a particular charging instruction to meet any factual variation present when the jury is to
be instructed about one or more of the following areas: second degree murder, involuntary
manslaughter, lesser included offenses, the guilty but mentally ill verdict, and the insanity
defense.
Only one instruction of the 2.01 series (and its corresponding partner from the 26.01
series) should be appropriate to any given set of facts. The Committee has attempted to anticipate
and include all potential factual situations. If, however, the court determines that the Committee
has failed to provide an instruction in the 2.01 series that is appropriate to the factual situation of
the case on trial, the court should then utilize Instruction 2.01 and modify it as may be needed.
In People v. Reddick, 123 Ill.2d 184, 526 N.E.2d 141, 122 Ill.Dec. 1 (1988), the Illinois
Supreme Court changed how a jury should be instructed when it is to consider both murder and
voluntary manslaughter as those offenses were defined prior to P.A. 84- 1450, which created the
offense of second degree murder. (See Committee Note to Instruction 7.02A.) The Committee
believes that the instructions contained in parts II and III of the 2.01 series, dealing with first and
second degree murder and involuntary manslaughter in various combinations, are fully
applicable to murder-voluntary manslaughter cases being tried under the statutes in effect before
amendments contained in P.A. 84- 1450, with only two slight modifications: (1) any reference in
a 2.01 instruction to first degree murder should be changed to murder, and (2) any reference to
second degree murder should be changed to voluntary manslaughter.
Guidelines for Choosing Among the 2.01 series Instructions
The 2.01 series has been divided into five parts to reduce the difficulty of finding the
appropriate instruction for use in any given factual setting.
PART I.
GENERAL CHARGING INSTRUCTION
Introductory Note
Instruction 2.01 is the general instruction concerning the charge against the defendant
(with some modifications) that previously appeared in earlier editions of IPI -Criminal. It should
be used when none of the 27 other, more specific, instructions from the 2.01 series is applicable.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
e5ff559d5d376d37bc559b458886c08752df746c4bbfe5ee9f3c6f306ccde658
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.