IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 18.30
Issues In Manufacture, Sale, Or Transfer Of Bullets Represented To Be Metal Piercing
Bullets
To sustain the charge of [(manufacture) (sale) (transfer)] of bullets represented to be
metal piercing bullets, the State must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(manufactured) (sold) (offered to sell)
(transferred)] a bullet; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant represented such bullet to be [(metal or armor
piercing) (polytetrafluoroethylene -coated) (jacketed and having a core other than lead or lead
alloy) (wholly composed of a metal or metal alloy other than lead)].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty. [However, if
you find the defendant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that ____, you should find
the defendant not guilty.]
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
341fc23657708d8c6526258dcd1e61ddd9ca1fd9141bb9d88a5623024e9df3ed
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.