Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 18.24

Issues In Defacing The Identification Marks Of Firearms

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

To sustain the charge of defacing the identification marks of firearms, the State must

prove the following proposition:

That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly)] changed, altered, removed, or

obliterated [(the name of the maker) (the name of the model) (the manufacturer's number) (any

identification mark)] of a firearm.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this proposition has been

proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this proposition has not been

proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
051b36ee6da6062e659cc810ce659b7df60dab780e092983f4f7c78a6231db0a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.