IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.63
Definition Of Manufacture Or Delivery Of Cannabis--Enhancing Factor Based On
Location On School Grounds
A person c
ommits the offense of [(manufacture of) (delivery of) (possession with the
intent to manufacture) (possession with the intent to deliver)] cannabis when he knowingly [
(manufactures) (delivers) (possesses with the intent to manufacture) (possesses with the intent to
deliver)] a substance containing cannabis [and the substance containing cannabis weighs [(more
than ____ grams) (more than ____ grams but not more than ____ grams)]] while
[1] in a school.
[or]
[2] on the r
eal property comprising a school.
[or]
[3] on a public
way within 1000 feet of the real property comprising a school.
[or]
[4] on any conv
eyance [(owned) (leased) (contracted)] by a school to transport students
to and from [(school) (a school related activity)].
[or]
[5] on a public w
ay within 1000 feet of any conveyance [(owned) (leased) (contracted)]
by a school to transport students to and from [(school) (a school related activity)].
Committ
ee Note
720 ILCS
550/5.2 (West, 1992) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 561/2, §705.2 (1991)), added
by P.A. 87-544, effective September 17, 1991.
Give I
nstruction 17.64.
Although S
ection 5.2 lists “Delivery of cannabis on school grounds” as a separate
offense, it incorporates and refers to violations of 720 ILCS 550/5 (West, 1992) (formerly
Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 561/2, §705 (1991)) (manufacture or delivery of cannabis) and merely enhances
the penalties one class higher whenever a violation of Section 5 occurs on school property. Thus,
the Committee thought it better to treat Section 5.2 as an enha ncing factor rather than a separate
offense.
The brac
keted numbers [1] through [5] correspond to the locations indicated in Section
5.2. Select the alternative that corresponds to the location in the charge.
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In many
cases, it will be necessary to give other instructions defining terms used in this
instruction. See Instruction 17.05A, defining the word “deliver;” Instructions 4.15 and 4.16,
defining the word “possession;” and 720 ILCS 550/3(h) (West, 1992) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch.
561/2, §703(h) (1991)), defining the word “manufacture.”
When manuf
acture or delivery of more than 2.5 grams of a substance containing cannabis
is charged, weight then determines the penalty for the offense and is an essential element to be
decided by the jury. See People v. Hill, 169 Ill.App.3d 901, 524 N.E.2d 604, 120 Ill.Dec. 574
(1st Dist.1988); People v. Kadlec, 21 Ill.App.3d 289, 313 N.E.2d 522 (3d Dist.1974). This is
accomplished by giving the bracketed material in this instruction and all three propositions in
Instruction 17.64.
Parti
cular care must be taken when disputes of weight support lesser included offenses.
See example in the Committee Note to Instruction 17.01 and People v. Smith, 67 Ill.App.3d 952,
385 N.E.2d 707, 24 Ill.Dec. 566 (5th Dist.1978).
When the pr
osecution must prove the quantity of the substance as an element of the
offense, it need not prove that the defendant knew the quantity was of any specific amount. See
People v. Ziehm, 120 Ill.App.3d 777, 458 N.E.2d 588, 76 Ill.Dec. 188 (2d Dist.1983); People v.
Cortez, 77 Ill.App.3d 448, 395 N.E.2d 1177, 32 Ill.Dec. 796 (1st Dist.1979).
Although t
he quantity may not always be required in the verdict forms, People v. Roy,
172 Ill.App.3d 16, 526 N.E.2d 204, 122 Ill.Dec. 64 (4th Dist.1988), the C ommittee recommends
that, to ensure clarity, each verdict form contain the same quantity language used in the
definitional and issues instructions supporting the verdict.
It should not
be necessary in most manufacture and delivery cases to add the phrase “...
but not more than ____ grams.” Only when a lesser included offense instruction based upon
weight is given are the statutory upper limits provided in 720 ILCS 550/5(b) through (d) an issue
in the case.
See Com
mittee Note to Instruction 17.05A if delivery is in dispute.
See Com
mittee Note to Instruction 17.01, concerning verdict forms and for directions on
how the jury should be instructed when the weight of the substance containing cannabis is in
dispute.
If other
terms used in this instruction need to be defined, see definitions contained in the
Cannabis Control Act, 720 ILCS 550/1 et seq.
Use appl
icable bracketed material.
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
c89e37fc323578cd7b4f956842e1ff4824f4d7b38fa965a73af74f61b80e6f45
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.