IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.49
Definition Of Unlawful Transfer Of A Telecommunications Device To A Minor
A person c
ommits the offense of unlawful transfer of a telecommunications device to a
minor when he gives, sells, or otherwise transfers possession of a telecommunications device to a
person under 18 years of age with the intent that the device be used to commit the offense of
____.
Committ
ee Note
720 ILCS
5/44- 2 (West, 1999) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, §44- 2 (1991)), added by
P.A. 86-811, effective January 1, 1990.
Give I
nstructions 17.49A and 17.50.
The stat
ute refers to “any offense under this [the Criminal] Code, the Cannabis Control
Act or the Illinois Controlled Substances Act.” The Committee believes that whether the offense
or offenses in question is “under” any of these three Codes is a question of law for the court to
resolve. Accordingly, if the court has determined that offense or offenses in question is under
any of these three Codes, then the jury should simply be given this general instruction, referring
to “offense” without further qualification.
Insert
in the blank the offense na med in the information or indictment, and give the
instruction defining that offense.
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
961954ea8fd2c9bcba68f5cdbfd295a98be63271dc959edabd21a010a7aa779c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.