Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.42

Issues In Permitting Unlawful Use Of A Building

activein force · 2026-09-10 – presentas-observed

To sustai

n the charge of permitting unlawful use of a building, the State must prove the

following propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant controlled a building; and

Second Proposition: That the defendant knowingly granted, permitted, or made that

building available for use for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing or delivering a controlled

substance.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Committ

ee Note

720 ILCS

570/406.1 (West, 1999) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 561/2, §1406.1), added by

P.A. 85-537, effective January 1, 1988.

Give I

nstruction 17.41.

When acc

ountability is an issue, ordinarily insert the phrase “or one for whose conduct he

is legally responsible” after the word “defendant” in each proposition. See Instruction 5.03.

_____________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-10
Edition
2026-09-10
Content hash
81d4e883937ad705bbe6509b48c13499912c3f6429294e6316364cfc9edf5789
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.42 · binding.law